Artificial intelligence advisory systems and methods for vibrant constitutional guidance

ABSTRACT

In an aspect, an artificial intelligence advisory system for vibrant constitutional guidance, the system comprising a computing device; an advisory module operating on the computing device, wherein the advisory module is configured to receive at least a user input from a user client device; evaluate the content of the user input to identify a theme of conversation; locate an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing the identified theme of conversation; and an artificial intelligence advisor operating on the computing device, wherein the artificial intelligence advisor is configured to match the theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process, wherein the repository response contains a plurality of textual outputs related to the theme of conversation; select a textual output contained within the repository response; and transmit the textual output to the user client device.

This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 16/372,540 filed on Apr. 2, 2019 and entitled “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VIBRANT CONSTITUTIONAL GUIDANCE,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of artificial intelligence. In particular, the present invention is directed to artificial intelligence advisory systems and methods for vibrant constitutional guidance.

BACKGROUND

Automated analysis of data and correct transmission of said data can be challenging due to the complexity of and multiplicity of data to be analyzed. Knowing which data should be transmitted to a user can be highly complex due to the unique and individual needs of each user—a problem exacerbated by the burgeoning volume of data available for analysis. Incorrect transmissions can lead to inaccuracies within systems, waste time trying to correct cumbersome issues, and ultimately frustrate users.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In an aspect, an artificial intelligence advisory system for vibrant constitutional guidance, the system comprising a computing device; an advisory module operating on the computing device, wherein the advisory module is configured to receive at least a user input from a user client device; evaluate the content of the user input to identify a theme of conversation; and locate an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing the identified theme of conversation; and an artificial intelligence advisor operating on the computing device, wherein the artificial intelligence advisor is configured to match the theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process, wherein the repository response contains a plurality of textual outputs related to the theme of conversation; select a textual output contained within the repository response; transmit the textual output to the user client device.

In an aspect, an artificial intelligence advisory method of vibrant constitutional guidance, the method comprising receiving by a computing device, at least a user input from a user client device; evaluating by the computing device, the content of the user input to identify a theme of conversation; locating by the computing device, an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing the identified theme of conversation; matching by the computing device, the theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process, wherein the repository response contains a plurality of textual outputs related to the theme of conversation; selecting by the computing device, a textual output contained within the repository response; and transmitting by the computing device, the textual output to the user client device.

These and other aspects and features of non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific non-limiting embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisory system for vibrant constitutional guidance;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a diagnostic engine;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating embodiments of data storage facilities for use in disclosed systems and methods;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a biological extraction database;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an expert knowledge database;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label database;

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label database;

FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label learner and associated system elements;

FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label learner and associated system elements;

FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a plan generator module and associated system elements;

FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label classification database;

FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label classification database;

FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a narrative language database;

FIG. 14 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an image database;

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a user database;

FIG. 16 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an advisory module and associated system elements;

FIG. 17 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisor and associated system elements;

FIG. 18 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a processing module;

FIG. 19 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a default response database;

FIG. 20 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a user communication learner;

FIG. 21 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a consultation initiator;

FIG. 22 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary method of vibrant constitutional guidance using artificial intelligence;

FIG. 23 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary method of vibrant constitutional guidance using artificial intelligence; and

FIG. 24 is a block diagram of a computing system that can be used to implement any one or more of the methodologies disclosed herein and any one or more portions thereof.

The drawings are not necessarily to scale and may be illustrated by phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details that are not necessary for an understanding of the embodiments or that render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Systems and methods are provided for machine-learning processing of heterogenous prognostic, ameliorative, and linguistic datasets. In an embodiment, a prognostic label learner may classify biological extraction data to prognostic labels. An ameliorative process label learner may classify prognostic labels to ameliorative processes. Parsing and processing modules may receive textual inputs, which may be resolved to queries; queries may be converted to responses using language processing elements and/or retrieval of responses from informational resources. Informational resources may include prognostic label learner and/or ameliorative label learner. As a result, responses to textual queries based on complex data may be generated efficiently.

Turning now to FIG. 1, an artificial intelligence advisory system 100 for vibrant constitutional guidance. Artificial intelligence advisory system includes at least a computing device 104. At least a computing device 104 may include any computing device as described below in reference to FIG. 23, including without limitation a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or system on a chip (SoC) as described below in reference to FIG. 23. At least a computing device 104 may be housed with, may be incorporated in, or may incorporate one or more sensors of at least a sensor. Computing device may include, be included in, and/or communicate with a mobile device such as a mobile telephone or smartphone. At least a computing device 104 may include a single computing device operating independently, or may include two or more computing device operating in concert, in parallel, sequentially or the like; two or more computing devices may be included together in a single computing device or in two or more computing devices. At least a computing device 104 may communicate with one or more additional devices as described below in further detail via a network interface device. Network interface device may be utilized for connecting a at least a computing device 104 to one or more of a variety of networks, and one or more devices. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software etc.) may be communicated to and/or from a computer and/or a computing device. At least a computing device 104 may include but is not limited to, for example, a at least a computing device 104 or cluster of computing devices in a first location and a second computing device or cluster of computing devices in a second location. At least a computing device 104 may include one or more computing devices dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and the like. At least a computing device 104 may distribute one or more computing tasks as described below across a plurality of computing devices of computing device, which may operate in parallel, in series, redundantly, or in any other manner used for distribution of tasks or memory between computing devices. At least a computing device 104 may be implemented using a “shared nothing” architecture in which data is cached at the worker, in an embodiment, this may enable scalability of system 100 and/or computing device.

Still referring to FIG. 1, system 100 includes a diagnostic engine 108 operating on the at least a computing device 104, wherein the diagnostic engine 108 configured to receive at least a biological extraction from a user and generate a diagnostic output, the diagnostic output including at least a prognostic label and at least an ameliorative process label. At least a computing device 104, diagnostic engine 108, and/or one or more modules operating thereon may be designed and/or configured to perform any method, method step, or sequence of method steps in any embodiment described in this disclosure, in any order and with any degree of repetition. For instance, at least a computing device 104 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to perform a single step or sequence repeatedly until a desired or commanded outcome is achieved; repetition of a step or a sequence of steps may be performed iteratively and/or recursively using outputs of previous repetitions as inputs to subsequent repetitions, aggregating inputs and/or outputs of repetitions to produce an aggregate result, reduction or decrement of one or more variables such as global variables, and/or division of a larger processing task into a set of iteratively addressed smaller processing tasks. At least a computing device 104 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform any step or sequence of steps as described in this disclosure in parallel, such as simultaneously and/or substantially simultaneously performing a step two or more times using two or more parallel threads, processor cores, or the like; division of tasks between parallel threads and/or processes may be performed according to any protocol suitable for division of tasks between iterations. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which steps, sequences of steps, processing tasks, and/or data may be subdivided, shared, or otherwise dealt with using iteration, recursion, and/or parallel processing.

Referring now to FIG. 2, at least a computing device 104 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may be designed and configured to receive training data. Training data, as used herein, is data containing correlation that a machine-learning process may use to model relationships between two or more categories of data elements. For instance, and without limitation, training data may include a plurality of data entries, each entry representing a set of data elements that were recorded, received, and/or generated together; data elements may be correlated by shared existence in a given data entry, by proximity in a given data entry, or the like. Multiple data entries in training data may evince one or more trends in correlations between categories of data elements; for instance, and without limitation, a higher value of a first data element belonging to a first category of data element may tend to correlate to a higher value of a second data element belonging to a second category of data element, indicating a possible proportional or other mathematical relationship linking values belonging to the two categories. Multiple categories of data elements may be related in training data according to various correlations; correlations may indicate causative and/or predictive links between categories of data elements, which may be modeled as relationships such as mathematical relationships by machine-learning processes as described in further detail below. Training data may be formatted and/or organized by categories of data elements, for instance by associating data elements with one or more descriptors corresponding to categories of data elements. As a non-limiting example, training data may include data entered in standardized forms by persons or processes, such that entry of a given data element in a given field in a form may be mapped to one or more descriptors of categories. Elements in training data may be linked to descriptors of categories by tags, tokens, or other data elements; for instance, and without limitation, training data may be provided in fixed-length formats, formats linking positions of data to categories such as comma-separated value (CSV) formats and/or self-describing formats such as extensible markup language (XML), enabling processes or devices to detect categories of data.

Alternatively or additionally, and still referring to FIG. 2, training data may include one or more elements that are not categorized; that is, training data may not be formatted or contain descriptors for some elements of data. Machine-learning algorithms and/or other processes may sort training data according to one or more categorizations using, for instance, natural language processing algorithms, tokenization, detection of correlated values in raw data and the like; categories may be generated using correlation and/or other processing algorithms. As a non-limiting example, in a corpus of text, phrases making up a number “n” of compound words, such as nouns modified by other nouns, may be identified according to a statistically significant prevalence of n-grams containing such words in a particular order; such an n-gram may be categorized as an element of language such as a “word” to be tracked similarly to single words, generating a new category as a result of statistical analysis. Similarly, in a data entry including some textual data, a person's name and/or a description of a medical condition or therapy may be identified by reference to a list, dictionary, or other compendium of terms, permitting ad-hoc categorization by machine-learning algorithms, and/or automated association of data in the data entry with descriptors or into a given format. The ability to categorize data entries automatedly may enable the same training data to be made applicable for two or more distinct machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

Still referring to FIG. 2, categorization device may be configured to receive a first training set 200 including a plurality of first data entries, each first data entry of the first training set 200 including at least an element of physiological state data 204 and at least a correlated first prognostic label 208. At least an element of physiological state data 204 may include any data indicative of a person's physiological state; physiological state may be evaluated with regard to one or more measures of health of a person's body, one or more systems within a person's body such as a circulatory system, a digestive system, a nervous system, or the like, one or more organs within a person's body, and/or any other subdivision of a person's body useful for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, hematological data, such as red blood cell count, which may include a total number of red blood cells in a person's blood and/or in a blood sample, hemoglobin levels, hematocrit representing a percentage of blood in a person and/or sample that is composed of red blood cells, mean corpuscular volume, which may be an estimate of the average red blood cell size, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, which may measure average weight of hemoglobin per red blood cell, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, which may measure an average concentration of hemoglobin in red blood cells, platelet count, mean platelet volume which may measure the average size of platelets, red blood cell distribution width, which measures variation in red blood cell size, absolute neutrophils, which measures the number of neutrophil white blood cells, absolute quantities of lymphocytes such as B-cells, T-cells, Natural Killer Cells, and the like, absolute numbers of monocytes including macrophage precursors, absolute numbers of eosinophils, and/or absolute counts of basophils. Physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, immune function data such as Interleukine-6 (IL-6), TNF-alpha, systemic inflammatory cytokines, and the like.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, data describing blood-born lipids, including total cholesterol levels, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, levels of triglycerides, and/or any other quantity of any blood-born lipid or lipid-containing substance. Physiological state data 204 may include measures of glucose metabolism such as fasting glucose levels and/or hemoglobin A1-C (HbA1c) levels. Physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, one or more measures associated with endocrine function, such as without limitation, quantities of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS), DHEA-Sulfate, quantities of cortisol, ratio of DHEAS to cortisol, quantities of testosterone quantities of estrogen, quantities of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), quantities of adipokines such as adiponectin, leptin, and/or ghrelin, quantities of somatostatin, progesterone, or the like. Physiological state data 204 may include measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Physiological state data 204 may include quantities of C-reactive protein, estradiol, ferritin, folate, homocysteine, prostate-specific Ag, thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin D, 25 hydroxy, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, uric acid, albumin, globulin, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline photophatase, alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), iron, and/or total iron binding capacity (TIBC), or the like. Physiological state data 204 may include antinuclear antibody levels. Physiological state data 204 may include aluminum levels. Physiological state data 204 may include arsenic levels. Physiological state data 204 may include levels of fibronigen, plasma cystatin C, and/or brain natriuretic peptide.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include measures of lung function such as forced expiratory volume, one second (FEV-1) which measures how much air can be exhaled in one second following a deep inhalation, forced vital capacity (FVC), which measures the volume of air that may be contained in the lungs. Physiological state data 204 may include a measurement blood pressure, including without limitation systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Physiological state data 204 may include a measure of waist circumference. Physiological state data 204 may include body mass index (BMI). Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of bone mass and/or density such as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of muscle mass. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of physical capability such as without limitation measures of grip strength, evaluations of standing balance, evaluations of gait speed, pegboard tests, timed up and go tests, and/or chair rising tests.

Still viewing FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of cognitive function, including without limitation Rey auditory verbal learning test results, California verbal learning test results, NIH toolbox picture sequence memory test, Digital symbol coding evaluations, and/or Verbal fluency evaluations. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of psychological function or state, such as without limitation clinical interviews, assessments of intellectual functioning and/or intelligence quotient (IQ) tests, personality assessments, and/or behavioral assessments. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more psychological self-assessments, which may include any self-administered and/or automatedly computer-administered assessments, whether administered within system 100 and/or via a third-party service or platform.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include one or more evaluations of sensory ability, including measures of audition, vision, olfaction, gustation, vestibular function and pain. Physiological state data 204 may include genomic data, including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples and/or sequences, such as without limitation DNA sequences contained in one or more chromosomes in human cells. Genomic data may include, without limitation, ribonucleic acid (RNA) samples and/or sequences, such as samples and/or sequences of messenger RNA (mRNA) or the like taken from human cells. Genetic data may include telomere lengths. Genomic data may include epigenetic data including data describing one or more states of methylation of genetic material. Physiological state data 204 may include proteomic data, which as used herein is data describing all proteins produced and/or modified by an organism, colony of organisms, or system of organisms, and/or a subset thereof. Physiological state data 204 may include data concerning a microbiome of a person, which as used herein includes any data describing any microorganism and/or combination of microorganisms living on or within a person, including without limitation biomarkers, genomic data, proteomic data, and/or any other metabolic or biochemical data useful for analysis of the effect of such microorganisms on other physiological state data 204 of a person, and/or on prognostic labels and/or ameliorative processes as described in further detail below. Physiological state data 204 may include any physiological state data 204, as described above, describing any multicellular organism living in or on a person including any parasitic and/or symbiotic organisms living in or on the persons; non-limiting examples may include mites, nematodes, flatworms, or the like. Examples of physiological state data 204 described in this disclosure are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be exhaustive. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples of physiological state data 204 that may be used consistently with descriptions of systems and methods as provided in this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, each element of first training set 200 includes at least a first prognostic label 208. A prognostic label, as described herein, is an element of data identifying and/or describing a current, incipient, or probable future medical condition affecting a person; medical condition may include a particular disease, one or more symptoms associated with a syndrome, a syndrome, and/or any other measure of current or future health and/or healthy aging. At least a prognostic label may be associated with a physical and/or somatic condition, a mental condition such as a mental illness, neurosis, or the like, or any other condition affecting human health that may be associated with one or more elements of physiological state data 204 as described in further detail below. Conditions associated with prognostic labels may include, without limitation one or more diseases, defined for purposes herein as conditions that negatively affect structure and/or function of part or all of an organism. Conditions associated with prognostic labels may include, without limitation, acute or chronic infections, including without limitation infections by bacteria, archaea, viruses, viroids, prions, single-celled eukaryotic organisms such as amoeba, paramecia, trypanosomes, plasmodia, leishmania, and/or fungi, and/or multicellular parasites such as nematodes, arthropods, fungi, or the like. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more immune disorders, including without limitation immunodeficiencies and/or auto-immune conditions. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more metabolic disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more endocrinal disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more cardiovascular disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more respiratory disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders affecting connective tissue. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more digestive disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more neurological disorders such as neuromuscular disorders, dementia, or the like. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders of the excretory system, including without limitation nephrological disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more liver disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders of the bones such as osteoporosis. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders affecting joints, such as osteoarthritis, gout, and/or rheumatoid arthritis. Prognostic labels be associated with one or more cancers, including without limitation carcinomas, lymphomas, leukemias, germ cell tumor cancers, blastomas, and/or sarcomas. Prognostic labels may include descriptors of latent, dormant, and/or apparent disorders, diseases, and/or conditions. Prognostic labels may include descriptors of conditions for which a person may have a higher than average probability of development, such as a condition for which a person may have a “risk factor”; for instance, a person currently suffering from abdominal obesity may have a higher than average probability of developing type II diabetes. The above-described examples are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be exhaustive. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples of conditions that may be associated with prognostic labels as described in this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 2, at least a prognostic label may be stored in any suitable data and/or data type. For instance, and without limitation, at least a prognostic label may include textual data, such as numerical, character, and/or string data. Textual data may include a standardized name and/or code for a disease, disorder, or the like; codes may include diagnostic codes and/or diagnosis codes, which may include without limitation codes used in diagnosis classification systems such as The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). In general, there is no limitation on forms textual data or non-textual data used as at least a prognostic label may take; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms which may be suitable for use as at least a prognostic label consistently with this disclosure.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, in each first data element of first training set 200, at least a first prognostic label 208 of the data element is correlated with at least an element of physiological state data 204 of the data element. In an embodiment, an element of physiological data is correlated with a prognostic label where the element of physiological data is located in the same data element and/or portion of data element as the prognostic label; for example, and without limitation, an element of physiological data is correlated with a prognostic element where both element of physiological data and prognostic element are contained within the same first data element of the first training set 200. As a further example, an element of physiological data is correlated with a prognostic element where both share a category label as described in further detail below, where each is within a certain distance of the other within an ordered collection of data in data element, or the like. Still further, an element of physiological data may be correlated with a prognostic label where the element of physiological data and the prognostic label share an origin, such as being data that was collected with regard to a single person or the like. In an embodiment, a first datum may be more closely correlated with a second datum in the same data element than with a third datum contained in the same data element; for instance, the first element and the second element may be closer to each other in an ordered set of data than either is to the third element, the first element and second element may be contained in the same subdivision and/or section of data while the third element is in a different subdivision and/or section of data, or the like. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms and/or degrees of correlation between physiological data and prognostic labels that may exist in first training set 200 and/or first data element consistently with this disclosure.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be designed and configured to associate at least an element of physiological state data 204 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of physiological state data 204. Significant categories of physiological state data 204 may include labels and/or descriptors describing types of physiological state data 204 that are identified as being of high relevance in identifying prognostic labels. As a non-limiting example, one or more categories may identify significant categories of physiological state data 204 based on degree of diagnostic relevance to one or more impactful conditions and/or within one or more medical or public health fields. For instance, and without limitation, a particular set of biomarkers, test results, and/or biochemical information may be recognized in a given medical field as useful for identifying various disease conditions or prognoses within a relevant field. As a non-limiting example, and without limitation, physiological data describing red blood cells, such as red blood cell count, hemoglobin levels, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and/or mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration may be recognized as useful for identifying various conditions such as dehydration, high testosterone, nutrient deficiencies, kidney dysfunction, chronic inflammation, anemia, and/or blood loss. As an additional example, hemoglobin levels may be useful for identifying elevated testosterone, poor oxygen deliverability, thiamin deficiency, insulin resistance, anemia, liver disease, hypothyroidism, arginine deficiency, protein deficiency, inflammation, and/or nutrient deficiencies. In a further non-limiting example, hematocrit may be useful for identifying dehydration, elevated testosterone, poor oxygen deliverability, thiamin deficiency, insulin resistance, anemia, liver disease, hypothyroidism, arginine deficiency, protein deficiency, inflammation, and/or nutrient deficiencies. Similarly, measures of lipid levels in blood, such as total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, triglycerides, LDL-C and/or HDL-C may be recognized as useful in identifying conditions such as poor thyroid function, insulin resistance, blood glucose dysregulation, magnesium deficiency, dehydration, kidney disease, familial hypercholesterolemia, liver dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, malabsorption, anemia, alcohol abuse, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, or the like. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional categories of physiological data that may be used consistently with this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may receive the list of significant categories according to any suitable process; for instance, and without limitation, diagnostic engine 108 may receive the list of significant categories from at least an expert. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 and/or a user device connected to diagnostic engine 108 may provide a graphical user interface, which may include without limitation a form or other graphical element having data entry fields, wherein one or more experts, including without limitation clinical and/or scientific experts, may enter information describing one or more categories of physiological data that the experts consider to be significant or useful for detection of conditions; fields in graphical user interface may provide options describing previously identified categories, which may include a comprehensive or near-comprehensive list of types of physiological data detectable using known or recorded testing methods, for instance in “drop-down” lists, where experts may be able to select one or more entries to indicate their usefulness and/or significance in the opinion of the experts. Fields may include free-form entry fields such as text-entry fields where an expert may be able to type or otherwise enter text, enabling expert to propose or suggest categories not currently recorded. Graphical user interface or the like may include fields corresponding to prognostic labels, where experts may enter data describing prognostic labels and/or categories of prognostic labels the experts consider related to entered categories of physiological data; for instance, such fields may include drop-down lists or other pre-populated data entry fields listing currently recorded prognostic labels, and which may be comprehensive, permitting each expert to select a prognostic label and/or a plurality of prognostic labels the expert believes to be predicted and/or associated with each category of physiological data selected by the expert. Fields for entry of prognostic labels and/or categories of prognostic labels may include free-form data entry fields such as text entry fields; as described above, examiners may enter data not presented in pre-populated data fields in the free-form data entry fields. Alternatively or additionally, fields for entry of prognostic labels may enable an expert to select and/or enter information describing or linked to a category of prognostic label that the expert considers significant, where significance may indicate likely impact on longevity, mortality, quality of life, or the like as described in further detail below. Graphical user interface may provide an expert with a field in which to indicate a reference to a document describing significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or significant categories of prognostic labels. Any data described above may alternatively or additionally be received from experts similarly organized in paper form, which may be captured and entered into data in a similar way, or in a textual form such as a portable document file (PDF) with examiner entries, or the like.

Referring again to FIG. 2, data information describing significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or significant categories of prognostic labels may alternatively or additionally be extracted from one or more documents using a language processing module 216. Language processing module 216 may include any hardware and/or software module. Language processing module 216 may be configured to extract, from the one or more documents, one or more words. One or more words may include, without limitation, strings of one or characters, including without limitation any sequence or sequences of letters, numbers, punctuation, diacritic marks, engineering symbols, geometric dimensioning and tollerancing (GD&T) symbols, chemical symbols and formulas, spaces, whitespace, and other symbols, including any symbols usable as textual data as described above. Textual data may be parsed into tokens, which may include a simple word (sequence of letters separated by whitespace) or more generally a sequence of characters as described previously. The term “token,” as used herein, refers to any smaller, individual groupings of text from a larger source of text; tokens may be broken up by word, pair of words, sentence, or other delimitation. These tokens may in turn be parsed in various ways. Textual data may be parsed into words or sequences of words, which may be considered words as well. Textual data may be parsed into “n-grams”, where all sequences of n consecutive characters are considered. Any or all possible sequences of tokens or words may be stored as “chains”, for example for use as a Markov chain or Hidden Markov Model.

Still referring to FIG. 2, language processing module 216 may compare extracted words to categories of physiological data recorded at diagnostic engine 108, one or more prognostic labels recorded at diagnostic engine 108, and/or one or more categories of prognostic labels recorded at diagnostic engine 108; such data for comparison may be entered on diagnostic engine 108 as described above using expert data inputs or the like. In an embodiment, one or more categories may be enumerated, to find total count of mentions in such documents. Alternatively or additionally, language processing module 216 may operate to produce a language processing model. Language processing model may include a program automatically generated by diagnostic engine 108 and/or language processing module 216 to produce associations between one or more words extracted from at least a document and detect associations, including without limitation mathematical associations, between such words, and/or associations of extracted words with categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels. Associations between language elements, where language elements include for purposes herein extracted words, categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels may include, without limitation, mathematical associations, including without limitation statistical correlations between any language element and any other language element and/or language elements. Statistical correlations and/or mathematical associations may include probabilistic formulas or relationships indicating, for instance, a likelihood that a given extracted word indicates a given category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels. As a further example, statistical correlations and/or mathematical associations may include probabilistic formulas or relationships indicating a positive and/or negative association between at least an extracted word and/or a given category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels; positive or negative indication may include an indication that a given document is or is not indicating a category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is or is not significant. For instance, and without limitation, a negative indication may be determined from a phrase such as “telomere length was not found to be an accurate predictor of overall longevity,” whereas a positive indication may be determined from a phrase such as “telomere length was found to be an accurate predictor of dementia,” as an illustrative example; whether a phrase, sentence, word, or other textual element in a document or corpus of documents constitutes a positive or negative indicator may be determined, in an embodiment, by mathematical associations between detected words, comparisons to phrases and/or words indicating positive and/or negative indicators that are stored in memory at diagnostic engine 108, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 2, language processing module 216 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may generate the language processing model by any suitable method, including without limitation a natural language processing classification algorithm; language processing model may include a natural language process classification model that enumerates and/or derives statistical relationships between input term and output terms. Algorithm to generate language processing model may include a stochastic gradient descent algorithm, which may include a method that iteratively optimizes an objective function, such as an objective function representing a statistical estimation of relationships between terms, including relationships between input terms and output terms, in the form of a sum of relationships to be estimated. In an alternative or additional approach, sequential tokens may be modeled as chains, serving as the observations in a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). HMMs as used herein are statistical models with inference algorithms that that may be applied to the models. In such models, a hidden state to be estimated may include an association between an extracted word category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels. There may be a finite number of category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels to which an extracted word may pertain, an HMM inference algorithm, such as the forward-backward algorithm or the Viterbi algorithm, may be used to estimate the most likely discrete state given a word or sequence of words. Language processing module 216 may combine two or more approaches. For instance, and without limitation, machine-learning program may use a combination of Naive-Bayes (NB), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), and parameter grid-searching classification techniques; the result may include a classification algorithm that returns ranked associations.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, generating language processing model may include generating a vector space, which may be a collection of vectors, defined as a set of mathematical objects that can be added together under an operation of addition following properties of associativity, commutativity, existence of an identity element, and existence of an inverse element for each vector, and can be multiplied by scalar values under an operation of scalar multiplication compatible with field multiplication, and that has an identity element is distributive with respect to vector addition, and is distributive with respect to field addition. Each vector in an n-dimensional vector space may be represented by an n-tuple of numerical values. Each unique extracted word and/or language element as described above may be represented by a vector of the vector space. In an embodiment, each unique extracted and/or other language element may be represented by a dimension of vector space; as a non-limiting example, each element of a vector may include a number representing an enumeration of co-occurrences of the word and/or language element represented by the vector with another word and/or language element. Vectors may be normalized, scaled according to relative frequencies of appearance and/or file sizes. In an embodiment associating language elements to one another as described above may include computing a degree of vector similarity between a vector representing each language element and a vector representing another language element; vector similarity may be measured according to any norm for proximity and/or similarity of two vectors, including without limitation cosine similarity, which measures the similarity of two vectors by evaluating the cosine of the angle between the vectors, which can be computed using a dot product of the two vectors divided by the lengths of the two vectors. Degree of similarity may include any other geometric measure of distance between vectors.

Still referring to FIG. 2, language processing module 216 may use a corpus of documents to generate associations between language elements in a language processing module 216, and diagnostic engine 108 may then use such associations to analyze words extracted from one or more documents and determine that the one or more documents indicate significance of a category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may perform this analysis using a selected set of significant documents, such as documents identified by one or more experts as representing good science, good clinical analysis, or the like; experts may identify or enter such documents via graphical user interface as described above in reference to FIG. 9, or may communicate identities of significant documents according to any other suitable method of electronic communication, or by providing such identity to other persons who may enter such identifications into diagnostic engine 108. Documents may be entered into diagnostic engine 108 by being uploaded by an expert or other persons using, without limitation, file transfer protocol (FTP) or other suitable methods for transmission and/or upload of documents; alternatively or additionally, where a document is identified by a citation, a uniform resource identifier (URI), uniform resource locator (URL) or other datum permitting unambiguous identification of the document, diagnostic engine 108 may automatically obtain the document using such an identifier, for instance by submitting a request to a database or compendium of documents such as JSTOR as provided by Ithaka Harbors, Inc. of New York.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, whether an entry indicating significance of a category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels is entered via graphical user interface, alternative submission means, and/or extracted from a document or body of documents as described above, an entry or entries may be aggregated to indicate an overall degree of significance. For instance, each category of physiological data, relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels may be given an overall significance score; overall significance score may, for instance, be incremented each time an expert submission and/or paper indicates significance as described above. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure will be aware of other ways in which scores may be generated using a plurality of entries, including averaging, weighted averaging, normalization, and the like. Significance scores may be ranked; that is, all categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels may be ranked according significance scores, for instance by ranking categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels higher according to higher significance scores and lower according to lower significance scores. Categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels may be eliminated from current use if they fail a threshold comparison, which may include a comparison of significance score to a threshold number, a requirement that significance score belong to a given portion of ranking such as a threshold percentile, quartile, or number of top-ranked scores. Significance scores may be used to filter outputs as described in further detail below; for instance, where a number of outputs are generated and automated selection of a smaller number of outputs is desired, outputs corresponding to higher significance scores may be identified as more probable and/or selected for presentation while other outputs corresponding to lower significance scores may be eliminated. Alternatively or additionally, significance scores may be calculated per sample type; for instance, entries by experts, documents, and/or descriptions of purposes of a given type of physiological test or sample collection as described above may indicate that for that type of physiological test or sample collection a first category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is significant with regard to that test, while a second category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is not significant; such indications may be used to perform a significance score for each category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is or is not significant per type of biological extraction, which then may be subjected to ranking, comparison to thresholds and/or elimination as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may detect further significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels using machine-learning processes, including without limitation unsupervised machine-learning processes as described in further detail below; such newly identified categories, as well as categories entered by experts in free-form fields as described above, may be added to pre-populated lists of categories, lists used to identify language elements for language learning module, and/or lists used to identify and/or score categories detected in documents, as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, in an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving the first training set 200, to associate at least correlated first prognostic label 208 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of prognostic labels. Significant categories of prognostic labels may be acquired, determined, and/or ranked as described above. As a non-limiting example, prognostic labels may be organized according to relevance to and/or association with a list of significant conditions. A list of significant conditions may include, without limitation, conditions having generally acknowledged impact on longevity and/or quality of life; this may be determined, as a non-limiting example, by a product of relative frequency of a condition within the population with years of life and/or years of able-bodied existence lost, on average, as a result of the condition. A list of conditions may be modified for a given person to reflect a family history of the person; for instance, a person with a significant family history of a particular condition or set of conditions, or a genetic profile having a similarly significant association therewith, may have a higher probability of developing such conditions than a typical person from the general population, and as a result diagnostic engine 108 may modify list of significant categories to reflect this difference.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 is designed and configured to receive a second training set 220 including a plurality of second data entries. Each second data entry of the second training set 220 includes at least a second prognostic label 224; at least a second prognostic label 224 may include any label suitable for use as at least a first prognostic label 208 as described above. Each second data entry of the second training set 220 includes at least an ameliorative process label 228 correlated with the at least a second prognostic label 224, where correlation may include any correlation suitable for correlation of at least a first prognostic label 208 to at least an element of physiological data as described above. As used herein, an ameliorative process label 228 is an identifier, which may include any form of identifier suitable for use as a prognostic label as described above, identifying a process that tends to improve a physical condition of a user, where a physical condition of a user may include, without limitation, any physical condition identifiable using a prognostic label. Ameliorative processes may include, without limitation, exercise programs, including amount, intensity, and/or types of exercise recommended. Ameliorative processes may include, without limitation, dietary or nutritional recommendations based on data including nutritional content, digestibility, or the like. Ameliorative processes may include one or more medical procedures. Ameliorative processes may include one or more physical, psychological, or other therapies. Ameliorative processes may include one or more medications. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various processes that may be used as ameliorative processes consistently with this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, in an embodiment diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to associate the at least second prognostic label 224 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of prognostic labels. This may be performed as described above for use of lists of significant categories with regard to at least a first prognostic label 208. Significance may be determined, and/or association with at least a category, may be performed for prognostic labels in first training set 200 according to a first process as described above and for prognostic labels in second training set 220 according to a second process as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to associate at least a correlated ameliorative process label 228 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of ameliorative process labels 228. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 and/or a user device connected to diagnostic engine 108 may provide a second graphical user interface 232 which may include without limitation a form or other graphical element having data entry fields, wherein one or more experts, including without limitation clinical and/or scientific experts, may enter information describing one or more categories of prognostic labels that the experts consider to be significant as described above; fields in graphical user interface may provide options describing previously identified categories, which may include a comprehensive or near-comprehensive list of types of prognostic labels, for instance in “drop-down” lists, where experts may be able to select one or more entries to indicate their usefulness and/or significance in the opinion of the experts. Fields may include free-form entry fields such as text-entry fields where an expert may be able to type or otherwise enter text, enabling expert to propose or suggest categories not currently recorded. Graphical user interface or the like may include fields corresponding to ameliorative labels, where experts may enter data describing ameliorative labels and/or categories of ameliorative labels the experts consider related to entered categories of prognostic labels; for instance, such fields may include drop-down lists or other pre-populated data entry fields listing currently recorded ameliorative labels, and which may be comprehensive, permitting each expert to select an ameliorative label and/or a plurality of ameliorative labels the expert believes to be predicted and/or associated with each category of prognostic labels selected by the expert. Fields for entry of ameliorative labels and/or categories of ameliorative labels may include free-form data entry fields such as text entry fields; as described above, examiners may enter data not presented in pre-populated data fields in the free-form data entry fields. Alternatively or additionally, fields for entry of ameliorative labels may enable an expert to select and/or enter information describing or linked to a category of ameliorative label that the expert considers significant, where significance may indicate likely impact on longevity, mortality, quality of life, or the like as described in further detail below. Graphical user interface may provide an expert with a field in which to indicate a reference to a document describing significant categories of prognostic labels, relationships of such categories to ameliorative labels, and/or significant categories of ameliorative labels. Such information may alternatively be entered according to any other suitable means for entry of expert data as described above. Data concerning significant categories of prognostic labels, relationships of such categories to ameliorative labels, and/or significant categories of ameliorative labels may be entered using analysis of documents using language processing module 216 or the like as described above.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may extract at least a second data entry from one or more documents; extraction may be performed using any language processing method as described above. Diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to receive at least a document describing at least a medical history and extract at least a second data entry of plurality of second data entries from the at least a document. A medical history document may include, for instance, a document received from an expert and/or medical practitioner describing treatment of a patient; document may be anonymized by removal of one or more patient-identifying features from document. A medical history document may include a case study, such as a case study published in a medical journal or written up by an expert. A medical history document may contain data describing and/or described by a prognostic label; for instance, the medical history document may list a diagnosis that a medical practitioner made concerning the patient, a finding that the patient is at risk for a given condition and/or evinces some precursor state for the condition, or the like. A medical history document may contain data describing and/or described by an ameliorative process label 228; for instance, the medical history document may list a therapy, recommendation, or other ameliorative process that a medical practitioner described or recommended to a patient. A medical history document may describe an outcome; for instance, medical history document may describe an improvement in a condition describing or described by a prognostic label, and/or may describe that the condition did not improve. Prognostic labels, ameliorative process labels 228, and/or efficacy of ameliorative process labels 228 may be extracted from and/or determined from one or more medical history documents using any processes for language processing as described above; for instance, language processing module 216 may perform such processes. As a non-limiting example, positive and/or negative indications regarding ameliorative processes identified in medical history documents may be determined in a manner described above for determination of positive and/or negative indications regarding categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to receiving at least a second data entry of the plurality of second data entries from at least an expert. This may be performed, without limitation using second graphical user interface as described above.

Referring now to FIG. 3, data incorporated in first training set 200 and/or second training set 220 may be incorporated in one or more databases. As a non-limiting example, one or elements of physiological state data may be stored in and/or retrieved from a biological extraction database 300. A biological extraction database 300 may include any data structure for ordered storage and retrieval of data, which may be implemented as a hardware or software module. A biological extraction database 300 may be implemented, without limitation, as a relational database, a key-value retrieval datastore such as a NOSQL database, or any other format or structure for use as a datastore that a person skilled in the art would recognize as suitable upon review of the entirety of this disclosure. A biological extraction database 300 may include a plurality of data entries and/or records corresponding to elements of physiological data as described above. Data entries and/or records may describe, without limitation, data concerning particular biological extractions that have been collected; entries may describe reasons for collection of samples, such as without limitation one or more conditions being tested for, which may be listed with related prognostic labels. Data entries may include prognostic labels and/or other descriptive entries describing results of evaluation of past biological extractions, including diagnoses that were associated with such samples, prognoses and/or conclusions regarding likelihood of future diagnoses that were associated with such samples, and/or other medical or diagnostic conclusions that were derived. Such conclusions may have been generated by diagnostic engine 108 in previous iterations of methods, with or without validation of correctness by medical professionals. Data entries in a biological extraction database 300 may be flagged with or linked to one or more additional elements of information, which may be reflected in data entry cells and/or in linked tables such as tables related by one or more indices in a relational database; one or more additional elements of information may include data associating a biological extraction and/or a person from whom a biological extraction was extracted or received with one or more cohorts, including demographic groupings such as ethnicity, sex, age, income, geographical region, or the like, one or more common diagnoses or physiological attributes shared with other persons having biological extractions reflected in other data entries, or the like. Additional elements of information may include one or more categories of physiological data as described above. Additional elements of information may include descriptions of particular methods used to obtain biological extractions, such as without limitation physical extraction of blood samples or the like, capture of data with one or more sensors, and/or any other information concerning provenance and/or history of data acquisition. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which data entries in a biological extraction database 300 may reflect categories, cohorts, and/or populations of data consistently with this disclosure.

Referring now to FIG. 4, one or more database tables in biological extraction database 300 may include, as a non-limiting example, a prognostic link table 400. Prognostic link table 400 may be a table relating biological extraction data as described above to prognostic labels; for instance, where an expert has entered data relating a prognostic label to a category of biological extraction data and/or to an element of biological extraction data via first graphical user interface 212 as described above, one or more rows recording such an entry may be inserted in prognostic link table 400. Alternatively or additionally, linking of prognostic labels to biological extraction data may be performed entirely in a prognostic label database as described below.

With continued reference to FIG. 4, biological extraction database 300 may include tables listing one or more samples according to sample source. For instance, and without limitation, biological extraction database 300 may include a fluid sample table 404 listing samples acquired from a person by extraction of fluids, such as without limitation blood, lymph cerebrospinal fluid, or the like. As another non-limiting example, biological extraction database 300 may include a sensor data table 408, which may list samples acquired using one or more sensors, for instance as described in further detail below. As a further non-limiting example, biological extraction database 300 may include a genetic sample table 412, which may list partial or entire sequences of genetic material. Genetic material may be extracted and amplified, as a non-limiting example, using polymerase chain reactions (PCR) or the like. As a further example, also non-limiting, biological extraction database 300 may include a medical report table 416, which may list textual descriptions of medical tests, including without limitation radiological tests or tests of strength and/or dexterity or the like. Data in medical report table may be sorted and/or categorized using a language processing module 412, for instance, translating a textual description into a numerical value and a label corresponding to a category of physiological data; this may be performed using any language processing algorithm or algorithms as referred to in this disclosure. As another non-limiting example, biological extraction database 300 may include a tissue sample table 420, which may record biological extractions obtained using tissue samples. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in biological extraction database 300 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, diagnostic engine 108 and/or another device in diagnostic engine 108 may populate one or more fields in biological extraction database 300 using expert information, which may be extracted or retrieved from an expert knowledge database 304. An expert knowledge database 304 may include any data structure and/or data store suitable for use as a biological extraction database 300 as described above. Expert knowledge database 304 may include data entries reflecting one or more expert submissions of data such as may have been submitted according to any process described above in reference to FIG. 2, including without limitation by using first graphical user interface 212 and/or second graphical user interface 232. Expert knowledge database may include one or more fields generated by language processing module 216, such as without limitation fields extracted from one or more documents as described above. For instance, and without limitation, one or more categories of physiological data and/or related prognostic labels and/or categories of prognostic labels associated with an element of physiological state data as described above may be stored in generalized from in an expert knowledge database 304 and linked to, entered in, or associated with entries in a biological extraction database 300. Documents may be stored and/or retrieved by diagnostic engine 108 and/or language processing module 216 in and/or from a document database 308; document database 308 may include any data structure and/or data store suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. Documents in document database 308 may be linked to and/or retrieved using document identifiers such as URI and/or URL data, citation data, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which documents may be indexed and retrieved according to citation, subject matter, author, date, or the like as consistent with this disclosure.

Referring now to FIG. 5, an exemplary embodiment of an expert knowledge database 304 is illustrated. Expert knowledge database 304 may, as a non-limiting example, organize data stored in the expert knowledge database 304 according to one or more database tables. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. For instance, a common column between two tables of expert knowledge database 300 may include an identifier of an expert submission, such as a form entry, textual submission, expert paper, or the like, for instance as defined below; as a result, a query may be able to retrieve all rows from any table pertaining to a given submission or set thereof. Other columns may include any other category usable for organization or subdivision of expert data, including types of expert data, names and/or identifiers of experts submitting the data, times of submission, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which expert data from one or more tables may be linked and/or related to expert data in one or more other tables.

Still referring to FIG. 5, one or more database tables in expert knowledge database 304 may include, as a non-limiting example, an expert prognostic table 500. Expert prognostic table 500 may be a table relating biological extraction data as described above to prognostic labels; for instance, where an expert has entered data relating a prognostic label to a category of biological extraction data and/or to an element of biological extraction data via first graphical user interface 212 as described above, one or more rows recording such an entry may be inserted in expert prognostic table 500. In an embodiment, a forms processing module 504 may sort data entered in a submission via first graphical user interface 212 by, for instance, sorting data from entries in the first graphical user interface 212 to related categories of data; for instance, data entered in an entry relating in the first graphical user interface 212 to a prognostic label may be sorted into variables and/or data structures for storage of prognostic labels, while data entered in an entry relating to a category of physiological data and/or an element thereof may be sorted into variables and/or data structures for the storage of, respectively, categories of physiological data or elements of physiological data. Where data is chosen by an expert from pre-selected entries such as drop-down lists, data may be stored directly; where data is entered in textual form, language processing module 216 may be used to map data to an appropriate existing label, for instance using a vector similarity test or other synonym-sensitive language processing test to map physiological data to an existing label. Alternatively or additionally, when a language processing algorithm, such as vector similarity comparison, indicates that an entry is not a synonym of an existing label, language processing module may indicate that entry should be treated as relating to a new label; this may be determined by, e.g., comparison to a threshold number of cosine similarity and/or other geometric measures of vector similarity of the entered text to a nearest existent label, and determination that a degree of similarity falls below the threshold number and/or a degree of dissimilarity falls above the threshold number. Data from expert textual submissions 508, such as accomplished by filling out a paper or PDF form and/or submitting narrative information, may likewise be processed using language processing module 216. Data may be extracted from expert papers 512, which may include without limitation publications in medical and/or scientific journals, by language processing module 216 via any suitable process as described herein. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional methods whereby novel terms may be separated from already-classified terms and/or synonyms therefore, as consistent with this disclosure. Expert prognostic table 500 may include a single table and/or a plurality of tables; plurality of tables may include tables for particular categories of prognostic labels such as a current diagnosis table, a future prognosis table, a genetic tendency table, a metabolic tendency table, and/or an endocrinal tendency table (not shown), to name a few non-limiting examples presented for illustrative purposes only.

With continued reference to FIG. 5, one or more database tables in expert knowledge database 304 may include, as a further non-limiting example tables listing one or more ameliorative process labels; expert data populating such tables may be provided, without limitation, using any process described above, including entry of data from second graphical user interface 232 via forms processing module 504 and/or language processing module 216, processing of textual submissions 508, or processing of expert papers 512. For instance, and without limitation, an ameliorative nutrition table 516 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional instructions, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As a further example an ameliorative action table 520 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on instructions for actions a user should take, including without limitation exercise, meditation, and/or cessation of harmful eating, substance abuse, or other habits, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As an additional example, an ameliorative supplement table 524 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional supplements, such as vitamin pills or the like, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As a further non-limiting example, an ameliorative medication table 528 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on medications, including without limitation over-the-counter and prescription pharmaceutical drugs, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As an additional example, a counterindication table 532 may list one or more counter-indications for one or more ameliorative processes; counterindications may include, without limitation allergies to one or more foods, medications, and/or supplements, side-effects of one or more medications and/or supplements, interactions between medications, foods, and/or supplements, exercises that should not be used given one or more medical conditions, injuries, disabilities, and/or demographic categories, or the like. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in expert knowledge database 304 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, a prognostic label database 312, which may be implemented in any manner suitable for implementation of biological extraction database 300, may be used to store prognostic labels used in diagnostic engine 108, including any prognostic labels correlated with elements of physiological data in first training set 200 as described above; prognostic labels may be linked to or refer to entries in biological extraction database 300 to which prognostic labels correspond. Linking may be performed by reference to historical data concerning biological extractions, such as diagnoses, prognoses, and/or other medical conclusions derived from biological extractions in the past; alternatively or additionally, a relationship between a prognostic label and a data entry in biological extraction database 300 may be determined by reference to a record in an expert knowledge database 304 linking a given prognostic label to a given category of biological extraction as described above. Entries in prognostic label database 312 may be associated with one or more categories of prognostic labels as described above, for instance using data stored in and/or extracted from an expert knowledge database 304.

Referring now to FIG. 6, an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label database 312 is illustrated. Prognostic label database 312 may, as a non-limiting example, organize data stored in the prognostic label database 312 according to one or more database tables. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. For instance, a common column between two tables of prognostic label database 312 may include an identifier of an expert submission, such as a form entry, textual submission, expert paper, or the like, for instance as defined below; as a result, a query may be able to retrieve all rows from any table pertaining to a given submission or set thereof. Other columns may include any other category usable for organization or subdivision of expert data, including types of expert data, names and/or identifiers of experts submitting the data, times of submission, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which expert data from one or more tables may be linked and/or related to expert data in one or more other tables.

Still referring to FIG. 6, one or more database tables in prognostic label database 312 may include, as a non-limiting example, an extraction data table 600. Extraction data table 600 may be a table listing sample data, along with, for instance, one or more linking columns to link such data to other information stored in prognostic label database 312. In an embodiment, extraction data 604 may be acquired, for instance from biological extraction database 300, in a raw or unsorted form, and may be translated into standard forms, such as standard units of measurement, labels associated with particular physiological data values, or the like; this may be accomplished using a data standardization module 608, which may perform unit conversions. Data standardization module 608 may alternatively or additionally map textual information, such as labels describing values tested for or the like, using language processing module 216 or equivalent components and/or algorithms thereto.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 6, prognostic label database 312 may include an extraction label table 612; extraction label table 612 may list prognostic labels received with and/or extracted from biological extractions, for instance as received in the form of extraction text 616. A language processing module 216 may compare textual information so received to prognostic labels and/or form new prognostic labels according to any suitable process as described above. Extraction prognostic link table 620 may combine extractions with prognostic labels, as acquired from extraction label table and/or expert knowledge database 304; combination may be performed by listing together in rows or by relating indices or common columns of two or more tables to each other. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in expert knowledge database 304 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, first training set 200 may be populated by retrieval of one or more records from biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database 312; in an embodiment, entries retrieved from biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database 312 may be filtered and or select via query to match one or more additional elements of information as described above, so as to retrieve a first training set 200 including data belonging to a given cohort, demographic population, or other set, so as to generate outputs as described below that are tailored to a person or persons with regard to whom diagnostic engine 108 classifies biological extractions to prognostic labels as set forth in further detail below. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which records may be retrieved from biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database to generate a first training set to reflect individualized group data pertaining to a person of interest in operation of system and/or method, including without limitation a person with regard to whom at least a biological extraction is being evaluated as described in further detail below. Diagnostic engine 108 may alternatively or additionally receive a first training set 200 and store one or more entries in biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database 312 as extracted from elements of first training set 200.

Still referring to FIG. 3, diagnostic engine 108 may include or communicate with an ameliorative process label database 316; an ameliorative process label database 316 may include any data structure and/or datastore suitable for use as a biological extraction database 300 as described above. An ameliorative process label database 316 may include one or more entries listing labels associated with one or more ameliorative processes as described above, including any ameliorative labels correlated with prognostic labels in second training set 220 as described above; ameliorative process labels may be linked to or refer to entries in prognostic label database 312 to which ameliorative process labels correspond. Linking may be performed by reference to historical data concerning prognostic labels, such as therapies, treatments, and/or lifestyle or dietary choices chosen to alleviate conditions associated with prognostic labels in the past; alternatively or additionally, a relationship between an ameliorative process label and a data entry in prognostic label database 312 may be determined by reference to a record in an expert knowledge database 304 linking a given ameliorative process label to a given category of prognostic label as described above. Entries in ameliorative process label database 312 may be associated with one or more categories of prognostic labels as described above, for instance using data stored in and/or extracted from an expert knowledge database 304.

Referring now to FIG. 7, an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label database 316 is illustrated. Ameliorative process label database 316 may, as a non-limiting example, organize data stored in the ameliorative process label database 316 according to one or more database tables. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. For instance, a common column between two tables of ameliorative process label database 316 may include an identifier of an expert submission, such as a form entry, textual submission, expert paper, or the like, for instance as defined below; as a result, a query may be able to retrieve all rows from any table pertaining to a given submission or set thereof. Other columns may include any other category usable for organization or subdivision of expert data, including types of expert data, names and/or identifiers of experts submitting the data, times of submission, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which expert data from one or more tables may be linked and/or related to expert data in one or more other tables.

Still referring to FIG. 7, ameliorative process label database 316 may include a prognostic link table 700; prognostic link table may link ameliorative process data to prognostic label data, using any suitable method for linking data in two or more tables as described above. Ameliorative process label database 316 may include an ameliorative nutrition table 704, which may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional instructions, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, for instance as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above, and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As a further example an ameliorative action table 708 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on instructions for actions a user should take, including without limitation exercise, meditation, and/or cessation of harmful eating, substance abuse, or other habits, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As an additional example, an ameliorative supplement table 712 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional supplements, such as vitamin pills or the like, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As a further non-limiting example, an ameliorative medication table 716 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on medications, including without limitation over-the-counter and prescription pharmaceutical drugs, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As an additional example, a counterindication table 720 may list one or more counter-indications for one or more ameliorative processes; counterindications may include, without limitation allergies to one or more foods, medications, and/or supplements, side-effects of one or more medications and/or supplements, interactions between medications, foods, and/or supplements, exercises that should not be used given one or more medical conditions, injuries, disabilities, and/or demographic categories, or the like; this may be acquired using expert submission as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in ameliorative process database 316 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, second training set 220 may be populated by retrieval of one or more records from prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316; in an embodiment, entries retrieved from prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316 may be filtered and or select via query to match one or more additional elements of information as described above, so as to retrieve a second training set 220 including data belonging to a given cohort, demographic population, or other set, so as to generate outputs as described below that are tailored to a person or persons with regard to whom diagnostic engine 108 classifies prognostic labels to ameliorative process labels as set forth in further detail below. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which records may be retrieved from prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316 to generate a second training set 220 to reflect individualized group data pertaining to a person of interest in operation of system and/or method, including without limitation a person with regard to whom at least a biological extraction is being evaluated as described in further detail below. Diagnostic engine 108 may alternatively or additionally receive a second training set 220 and store one or more entries in prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as extracted from elements of second training set 220.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3, diagnostic engine 108 may receive an update to one or more elements of data represented in first training set 200 and/or second training set 220, and may perform one or more modifications to first training set 200 and/or second training set 220, or to biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as a result. For instance a biological extraction may turn out to have been erroneously recorded; diagnostic engine 108 may remove it from first training set 200, second training set 220, biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as a result. As a further example, a medical and/or academic paper, or a study on which it was based, may be revoked; diagnostic engine 108 may remove it from first training set 200, second training set 220, biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as a result. Information provided by an expert may likewise be removed if the expert loses credentials or is revealed to have acted fraudulently.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 3, elements of data first training set 200, second training set 220, biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 may have temporal attributes, such as timestamps; diagnostic engine 108 may order such elements according to recency, select only elements more recently entered for first training set 200 and/or second training set 220, or otherwise bias training sets, database entries, and/or machine-learning models as described in further detail below toward more recent or less recent entries. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which temporal attributes of data entries may be used to affect results of methods and/or systems as described herein.

Referring again to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to record at least a biological extraction. At least a biological extraction may include a physically extracted sample, which as used herein includes a sample obtained by removing and analyzing tissue and/or fluid. Physically extracted sample may include without limitation a blood sample, a tissue sample, a buccal swab, a mucous sample, a stool sample, a hair sample, a fingernail sample, or the like. Physically extracted sample may include, as a non-limiting example, at least a blood sample. As a further non-limiting example, at least a biological extraction may include at least a genetic sample. At least a genetic sample may include a complete genome of a person or any portion thereof. At least a genetic sample may include a DNA sample and/or an RNA sample. At least a biological extraction may include an epigenetic sample, a proteomic sample, a tissue sample, a biopsy, and/or any other physically extracted sample. At least a biological extraction may include an endocrinal sample. As a further non-limiting example, the at least a biological extraction may include a signal from at least a sensor configured to detect physiological data of a user and recording the at least a biological extraction as a function of the signal. At least a sensor may include any medical sensor and/or medical device configured to capture sensor data concerning a patient, including any scanning, radiological and/or imaging device such as without limitation x-ray equipment, computer assisted tomography (CAT) scan equipment, positron emission tomography (PET) scan equipment, any form of magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) equipment, ultrasound equipment, optical scanning equipment such as photo-plethysmographic equipment, or the like. At least a sensor may include any electromagnetic sensor, including without limitation electroencephalographic sensors, magnetoencephalographic sensors, electrocardiographic sensors, electromyographic sensors, or the like. At least a sensor may include a temperature sensor. At least a sensor may include any sensor that may be included in a mobile device and/or wearable device, including without limitation a motion sensor such as an inertial measurement unit (IMU), one or more accelerometers, one or more gyroscopes, one or more magnetometers, or the like. At least a wearable and/or mobile device sensor may capture step, gait, and/or other mobility data, as well as data describing activity levels and/or physical fitness. At least a wearable and/or mobile device sensor may detect heart rate or the like. At least a sensor may detect any hematological parameter including blood oxygen level, pulse rate, heart rate, pulse rhythm, and/or blood pressure. At least a sensor may be a part of diagnostic engine 108 or may be a separate device in communication with diagnostic engine 108.

Still referring to FIG. 2, at least a biological extraction may include any data suitable for use as physiological state data as described above, including without limitation any result of any medical test, physiological assessment, cognitive assessment, psychological assessment, or the like. System 100 may receive at least a biological extraction from one or more other devices after performance; system 100 may alternatively or additionally perform one or more assessments and/or tests to obtain at least a biological extraction, and/or one or more portions thereof, on system 100. For instance, at least biological extraction may include or more entries by a user in a form or similar graphical user interface object; one or more entries may include, without limitation, user responses to questions on a psychological, behavioral, personality, or cognitive test. For instance, at least a computing device 104 may present to user a set of assessment questions designed or intended to evaluate a current state of mind of the user, a current psychological state of the user, a personality trait of the user, or the like; at least a computing device 104 may provide user-entered responses to such questions directly as at least a biological extraction and/or may perform one or more calculations or other algorithms to derive a score or other result of an assessment as specified by one or more testing protocols, such as automated calculation of a Stanford-Binet and/or Wechsler scale for IQ testing, a personality test scoring such as a Myers-Briggs test protocol, or other assessments that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Alternatively or additionally, and with continued reference to FIG. 2, at least a biological extraction may include assessment and/or self-assessment data, and/or automated or other assessment results, obtained from a third-party device; third-party device may include, without limitation, a server or other device (not shown) that performs automated cognitive, psychological, behavioral, personality, or other assessments. Third-party device may include a device operated by an informed advisor.

Still referring to FIG. 2, at least a biological extraction may include data describing one or more test results, including results of mobility tests, stress tests, dexterity tests, endocrinal tests, genetic tests, and/or electromyographic tests, biopsies, radiological tests, genetic tests, and/or sensory tests. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples of at least a biological extraction consistent with this disclosure. At least a biological extraction may be added to biological extraction database 300.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may include a prognostic label learner 236 operating on the diagnostic engine 108, the prognostic label learner 236 designed and configured to generate the at least a prognostic output as a function of the first training set 200 and the at least a biological extraction. Prognostic label learner 236 may include any hardware and/or software module. Prognostic label learner 236 is designed and configured to generate outputs using machine learning processes. A machine learning process is a process that automatedly uses a body of data known as “training data” and/or a “training set” to generate an algorithm that will be performed by a computing device/module to produce outputs given data provided as inputs; this is in contrast to a non-machine learning software program where the commands to be executed are determined in advance by a user and written in a programming language.

Still referring to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may be designed and configured to generate at least a prognostic output by creating at least a first machine-learning model 240 relating physiological state data 204 to prognostic labels using the first training set 200 and generating the at least a prognostic output using the first machine-learning model 240; at least a first machine-learning model 240 may include one or more models that determine a mathematical relationship between physiological state data 204 and prognostic labels. Such models may include without limitation model developed using linear regression models. Linear regression models may include ordinary least squares regression, which aims to minimize the square of the difference between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes according to an appropriate norm for measuring such a difference (e.g. a vector-space distance norm); coefficients of the resulting linear equation may be modified to improve minimization. Linear regression models may include ridge regression methods, where the function to be minimized includes the least-squares function plus term multiplying the square of each coefficient by a scalar amount to penalize large coefficients. Linear regression models may include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models, in which ridge regression is combined with multiplying the least-squares term by a factor of 1 divided by double the number of samples. Linear regression models may include a multi-task lasso model wherein the norm applied in the least-squares term of the lasso model is the Frobenius norm amounting to the square root of the sum of squares of all terms. Linear regression models may include the elastic net model, a multi-task elastic net model, a least angle regression model, a LARS lasso model, an orthogonal matching pursuit model, a Bayesian regression model, a logistic regression model, a stochastic gradient descent model, a perceptron model, a passive aggressive algorithm, a robustness regression model, a Huber regression model, or any other suitable model that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure. Linear regression models may be generalized in an embodiment to polynomial regression models, whereby a polynomial equation (e.g. a quadratic, cubic or higher-order equation) providing a best predicted output/actual output fit is sought; similar methods to those described above may be applied to minimize error functions, as will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, machine-learning algorithm used to generate first machine-learning model 240 may include, without limitation, linear discriminant analysis. Machine-learning algorithm may include quadratic discriminate analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include kernel ridge regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include support vector machines, including without limitation support vector classification-based regression processes. Machine-learning algorithms may include stochastic gradient descent algorithms, including classification and regression algorithms based on stochastic gradient descent. Machine-learning algorithms may include nearest neighbors algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include Gaussian processes such as Gaussian Process Regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include cross-decomposition algorithms, including partial least squares and/or canonical correlation analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include naive Bayes methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include algorithms based on decision trees, such as decision tree classification or regression algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include ensemble methods such as bagging meta-estimator, forest of randomized tress, AdaBoost, gradient tree boosting, and/or voting classifier methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include neural net algorithms, including convolutional neural net processes.

Still referring to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may generate prognostic output using alternatively or additional artificial intelligence methods, including without limitation by creating an artificial neural network, such as a convolutional neural network comprising an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training dataset are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning. This network may be trained using first training set 200; the trained network may then be used to apply detected relationships between elements of physiological state data 204 and prognostic labels.

Referring now to FIG. 8, machine-learning algorithms used by prognostic label learner 236 may include supervised machine-learning algorithms, which may, as a non-limiting example be executed using a supervised learning module 800 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. Supervised machine learning algorithms, as defined herein, include algorithms that receive a training set relating a number of inputs to a number of outputs, and seek to find one or more mathematical relations relating inputs to outputs, where each of the one or more mathematical relations is optimal according to some criterion specified to the algorithm using some scoring function. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may use elements of physiological data as inputs, prognostic labels as outputs, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between elements of physiological data and prognostic labels; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given element of physiological state data 204 and/or combination of elements of physiological data is associated with a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels to minimize the probability that a given element of physiological state data 204 and/or combination of elements of physiological state data 204 is not associated with a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels. Scoring function may be expressed as a risk function representing an “expected loss” of an algorithm relating inputs to outputs, where loss is computed as an error function representing a degree to which a prediction generated by the relation is incorrect when compared to a given input-output pair provided in first training set 200. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various possible variations of supervised machine learning algorithms that may be used to determine relation between elements of physiological data and prognostic labels. In an embodiment, one or more supervised machine-learning algorithms may be restricted to a particular domain for instance, a supervised machine-learning process may be performed with respect to a given set of parameters and/or categories of parameters that have been suspected to be related to a given set of prognostic labels, and/or are specified as linked to a medical specialty and/or field of medicine covering a particular set of prognostic labels. As a non-limiting example, a particular set of blood test biomarkers and/or sensor data may be typically used by cardiologists to diagnose or predict various cardiovascular conditions, and a supervised machine-learning process may be performed to relate those blood test biomarkers and/or sensor data to the various cardiovascular conditions; in an embodiment, domain restrictions of supervised machine-learning procedures may improve accuracy of resulting models by ignoring artifacts in training data. Domain restrictions may be suggested by experts and/or deduced from known purposes for particular evaluations and/or known tests used to evaluate prognostic labels. Additional supervised learning processes may be performed without domain restrictions to detect, for instance, previously unknown and/or unsuspected relationships between physiological data and prognostic labels.

Referring again to FIG. 2, machine-learning algorithms may include unsupervised processes; unsupervised processes may, as a non-limiting example, be executed by an unsupervised learning module 804 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. An unsupervised machine-learning process, as used herein, is a process that derives inferences in datasets without regard to labels; as a result, an unsupervised machine-learning process may be free to discover any structure, relationship, and/or correlation provided in the data. For instance, and without limitation, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform an unsupervised machine learning process on first training set 200, which may cluster data of first training set 200 according to detected relationships between elements of the first training set 200, including without limitation correlations of elements of physiological state data 204 to each other and correlations of prognostic labels to each other; such relations may then be combined with supervised machine learning results to add new criteria for prognostic label learner 236 to apply in relating physiological state data 204 to prognostic labels. As a non-limiting, illustrative example, an unsupervised process may determine that a first element of physiological data acquired in a blood test correlates closely with a second element of physiological data, where the first element has been linked via supervised learning processes to a given prognostic label, but the second has not; for instance, the second element may not have been defined as an input for the supervised learning process, or may pertain to a domain outside of a domain limitation for the supervised learning process. Continuing the example a close correlation between first element of physiological state data 204 and second element of physiological state data 204 may indicate that the second element is also a good predictor for the prognostic label; second element may be included in a new supervised process to derive a relationship or may be used as a synonym or proxy for the first physiological element by prognostic label learner 236.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 and/or prognostic label learner 236 may detect further significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels using machine-learning processes, including without limitation unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; such newly identified categories, as well as categories entered by experts in free-form fields as described above, may be added to pre-populated lists of categories, lists used to identify language elements for language learning module, and/or lists used to identify and/or score categories detected in documents, as described above. In an embodiment, as additional data is added to diagnostic engine 108, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may continuously or iteratively perform unsupervised machine-learning processes to detect relationships between different elements of the added and/or overall data; in an embodiment, this may enable diagnostic engine 108 to use detected relationships to discover new correlations between known biomarkers, prognostic labels, and/or ameliorative labels and one or more elements of data in large bodies of data, such as genomic, proteomic, and/or microbiome-related data, enabling future supervised learning and/or lazy learning processes as described in further detail below to identify relationships between, e.g., particular clusters of genetic alleles and particular prognostic labels and/or suitable ameliorative labels. Use of unsupervised learning may greatly enhance the accuracy and detail with which system may detect prognostic labels and/or ameliorative labels.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, unsupervised processes may be subjected to domain limitations. For instance, and without limitation, an unsupervised process may be performed regarding a comprehensive set of data regarding one person, such as a comprehensive medical history, set of test results, and/or physiological data such as genomic, proteomic, and/or other data concerning that persons. As another non-limiting example, an unsupervised process may be performed on data concerning a particular cohort of persons; cohort may include, without limitation, a demographic group such as a group of people having a shared age range, ethnic background, nationality, sex, and/or gender. Cohort may include, without limitation, a group of people having a shared value for an element and/or category of physiological data, a group of people having a shared value for an element and/or category of prognostic label, and/or a group of people having a shared value and/or category of ameliorative label; as illustrative examples, cohort could include all people having a certain level or range of levels of blood triglycerides, all people diagnosed with type II diabetes, all people who regularly run between 10 and 15 miles per week, or the like. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of ways in which cohorts and/or other sets of data may be defined and/or limited for a particular unsupervised learning process.

Still referring to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may alternatively or additionally be designed and configured to generate at least a prognostic output by executing a lazy learning process as a function of the first training set 200 and the at least a biological extraction; lazy learning processes may be performed by a lazy learning module 808 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. A lazy-learning process and/or protocol, which may alternatively be referred to as a “lazy loading” or “call-when-needed” process and/or protocol, may be a process whereby machine learning is conducted upon receipt of an input to be converted to an output, by combining the input and training set to derive the algorithm to be used to produce the output on demand. For instance, an initial set of simulations may be performed to cover a “first guess” at a prognostic label associated with biological extraction, using first training set 200. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of prognostic labels according to relation to a test type of at least a biological extraction, one or more categories of physiological data identified in test type of at least a biological extraction, and/or one or more values detected in at least a biological extraction; ranking may include, without limitation, ranking according to significance scores of associations between elements of physiological data and prognostic labels, for instance as calculated as described above. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or prognostic labels. Prognostic label learner 236 may alternatively or additionally implement any suitable “lazy learning” algorithm, including without limitation a K-nearest neighbors algorithm, a lazy naive Bayes algorithm, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various lazy-learning algorithms that may be applied to generate prognostic outputs as described in this disclosure, including without limitation lazy learning applications of machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and continuing to refer to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may generate a plurality of prognostic labels having different implications for a particular person. For instance, where the at least a biological extraction includes a result of a dexterity test, a low score may be consistent with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and/or any number of less sever disorders or tendencies associated with lower levels of dexterity. In such a situation, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform additional processes to resolve ambiguity. Processes may include presenting multiple possible results to a medical practitioner, informing the medical practitioner that one or more follow-up tests and/or biological extractions are needed to further determine a more definite prognostic label. Alternatively or additionally, processes may include additional machine learning steps; for instance, where reference to a model generated using supervised learning on a limited domain has produced multiple mutually exclusive results and/or multiple results that are unlikely all to be correct, or multiple different supervised machine learning models in different domains may have identified mutually exclusive results and/or multiple results that are unlikely all to be correct. In such a situation, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may operate a further algorithm to determine which of the multiple outputs is most likely to be correct; algorithm may include use of an additional supervised and/or unsupervised model. Alternatively or additionally, prognostic label learner 236 may perform one or more lazy learning processes using a more comprehensive set of user data to identify a more probably correct result of the multiple results. Results may be presented and/or retained with rankings, for instance to advise a medical professional of the relative probabilities of various prognostic labels being correct; alternatively or additionally, prognostic labels associated with a probability of correctness below a given threshold and/or prognostic labels contradicting results of the additional process, may be eliminated. As a non-limiting example, an endocrinal test may determine that a given person has high levels of dopamine, indicating that a poor pegboard performance is almost certainly not being caused by Parkinson's disease, which may lead to Parkinson's being eliminated from a list of prognostic labels associated with poor pegboard performance, for that person. Similarly, a genetic test may eliminate Huntington's disease, or another disease definitively linked to a given genetic profile, as a cause. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which additional processing may be used to determine relative likelihoods of prognostic labels on a list of multiple prognostic labels, and/or to eliminate some labels from such a list. Prognostic output 812 may be provided to user output device as described in further detail below.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 includes an ameliorative process label learner 244 operating on the diagnostic engine 108, the ameliorative process label learner 244 designed and configured to generate the at least an ameliorative output as a function of the second training set 220 and the at least a prognostic output. Ameliorative process label learner 244 may include any hardware or software module suitable for use as a prognostic label learner 236 as described above. Ameliorative process label learner 244 is a machine-learning module as described above; ameliorative process label learner 244 may perform any machine-learning process or combination of processes suitable for use by a prognostic label learner 236 as described above. For instance, and without limitation, and ameliorative process label learner 244 may be configured to create a second machine-learning model 248 relating prognostic labels to ameliorative labels using the second training set 220 and generate the at least an ameliorative output using the second machine-learning model 248; second machine-learning model 248 may be generated according to any process, process steps, or combination of processes and/or process steps suitable for creation of first machine learning model. In an embodiment, ameliorative process label learner 244 may use data from first training set 200 as well as data from second training set 220; for instance, ameliorative process label learner 244 may use lazy learning and/or model generation to determine relationships between elements of physiological data, in combination with or instead of prognostic labels, and ameliorative labels. Where ameliorative process label learner 244 determines relationships between elements of physiological data and ameliorative labels directly, this may determine relationships between prognostic labels and ameliorative labels as well owing to the existence of relationships determined by prognostic label learner 236.

Referring now to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may be configured to perform one or more supervised learning processes, as described above; supervised learning processes may be performed by a supervised learning module 900 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may use prognostic labels as inputs, ameliorative labels as outputs, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between prognostic labels and ameliorative labels; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels is associated with a given ameliorative label and/or combination of ameliorative labels to minimize the probability that a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels is not associated with a given ameliorative label and/or combination of ameliorative labels. In an embodiment, one or more supervised machine-learning algorithms may be restricted to a particular domain; for instance, a supervised machine-learning process may be performed with respect to a given set of parameters and/or categories of prognostic labels that have been suspected to be related to a given set of ameliorative labels, for instance because the ameliorative processes corresponding to the set of ameliorative labels are hypothesized or suspected to have an ameliorative effect on conditions represented by the prognostic labels, and/or are specified as linked to a medical specialty and/or field of medicine covering a particular set of prognostic labels and/or ameliorative labels. As a non-limiting example, a particular set prognostic labels corresponding to a set of cardiovascular conditions may be typically treated by cardiologists, and a supervised machine-learning process may be performed to relate those prognostic labels to ameliorative labels associated with various treatment options, medications, and/or lifestyle changes.

With continued reference to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may perform one or more unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; unsupervised processes may be performed by an unsupervised learning module 904 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. For instance, and without limitation, ameliorative process label learner 244 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform an unsupervised machine learning process on second training set 220, which may cluster data of second training set 220 according to detected relationships between elements of the second training set 220, including without limitation correlations of prognostic labels to each other and correlations of ameliorative labels to each other; such relations may then be combined with supervised machine learning results to add new criteria for ameliorative process label learner 244 to apply in relating prognostic labels to ameliorative labels. As a non-limiting, illustrative example, an unsupervised process may determine that a first prognostic label 208 correlates closely with a second prognostic label 224, where the first prognostic label 208 has been linked via supervised learning processes to a given ameliorative label, but the second has not; for instance, the second prognostic label 224 may not have been defined as an input for the supervised learning process, or may pertain to a domain outside of a domain limitation for the supervised learning process. Continuing the example, a close correlation between first prognostic label 208 and second prognostic label 224 may indicate that the second prognostic label 224 is also a good match for the ameliorative label; second prognostic label 224 may be included in a new supervised process to derive a relationship or may be used as a synonym or proxy for the first prognostic label 208 by ameliorative process label learner 244. Unsupervised processes performed by ameliorative process label learner 244 may be subjected to any domain limitations suitable for unsupervised processes performed by prognostic label learner 236 as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 9, diagnostic engine 108 and/or ameliorative process label learner 244 may detect further significant categories of prognostic labels, relationships of such categories to ameliorative labels, and/or categories of ameliorative labels using machine-learning processes, including without limitation unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; such newly identified categories, as well as categories entered by experts in free-form fields as described above, may be added to pre-populated lists of categories, lists used to identify language elements for language learning module, and/or lists used to identify and/or score categories detected in documents, as described above. In an embodiment, as additional data is added to diagnostic engine 108, ameliorative process label learner 244 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may continuously or iteratively perform unsupervised machine-learning processes to detect relationships between different elements of the added and/or overall data; in an embodiment, this may enable diagnostic engine 108 to use detected relationships to discover new correlations between known biomarkers, prognostic labels, and/or ameliorative labels and one or more elements of data in large bodies of data, such as genomic, proteomic, and/or microbiome-related data, enabling future supervised learning and/or lazy learning processes to identify relationships between, e.g., particular clusters of genetic alleles and particular prognostic labels and/or suitable ameliorative labels. Use of unsupervised learning may greatly enhance the accuracy and detail with which system may detect prognostic labels and/or ameliorative labels.

Continuing to view FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may be configured to perform a lazy learning process as a function of the second training set 220 and the at least a prognostic output to produce the at least an ameliorative output; a lazy learning process may include any lazy learning process as described above regarding prognostic label learner 236. Lazy learning processes may be performed by a lazy learning module 908 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. Ameliorative output 912 may be provided to a user output device as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may generate a plurality of ameliorative labels having different implications for a particular person. For instance, where a prognostic label indicates that a person has a magnesium deficiency, various dietary choices may be generated as ameliorative labels associated with correcting the deficiency, such as ameliorative labels associated with consumption of almonds, spinach, and/or dark chocolate, as well as ameliorative labels associated with consumption of magnesium supplements. In such a situation, ameliorative process label learner 244 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform additional processes to resolve ambiguity. Processes may include presenting multiple possible results to a medical practitioner, informing the medical practitioner of various options that may be available, and/or that follow-up tests, procedures, or counseling may be required to select an appropriate choice. Alternatively or additionally, processes may include additional machine learning steps. For instance, ameliorative process label learner 244 may perform one or more lazy learning processes using a more comprehensive set of user data to identify a more probably correct result of the multiple results. Results may be presented and/or retained with rankings, for instance to advise a medical professional of the relative probabilities of various ameliorative labels being correct or ideal choices for a given person; alternatively or additionally, ameliorative labels associated with a probability of success or suitability below a given threshold and/or ameliorative labels contradicting results of the additional process, may be eliminated. As a non-limiting example, an additional process may reveal that a person is allergic to tree nuts, and consumption of almonds may be eliminated as an ameliorative label to be presented.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may be designed and configured to generate further training data and/or to generate outputs using longitudinal data 916. As used herein, longitudinal data 916 may include a temporally ordered series of data concerning the same person, or the same cohort of persons; for instance, longitudinal data 916 may describe a series of blood samples taken one day or one month apart over the course of a year. Longitudinal data 916 may related to a series of samples tracking response of one or more elements of physiological data recorded regarding a person undergoing one or more ameliorative processes linked to one or more ameliorative process labels. Ameliorative process label learner 244 may track one or more elements of physiological data and fit, for instance, a linear, polynomial, and/or splined function to data points; linear, polynomial, or other regression across larger sets of longitudinal data, using, for instance, any regression process as described above, may be used to determine a best-fit graph or function for the effect of a given ameliorative process over time on a physiological parameter. Functions may be compared to each other to rank ameliorative processes; for instance, an ameliorative process associated with a steeper slope in curve representing improvement in a physiological data element, and/or a shallower slope in a curve representing a slower decline, may be ranked higher than an ameliorative process associated with a less steep slope for an improvement curve or a steeper slope for a curve marking a decline. Ameliorative processes associated with a curve and/or terminal data point representing a value that does not associate with a previously detected prognostic label may be ranked higher than one that is not so associated. Information obtained by analysis of longitudinal data 916 may be added to ameliorative process database and/or second training set.

Embodiments of diagnostic engine 108 may furnish augmented intelligence systems that facilitate diagnostic, prognostic, curative, and/or therapeutic decisions by medical professionals such as doctors. Diagnostic engine 108 may provide fully automated tools and resources for each doctor to handle, process, diagnosis, develop treatment plans, facilitate and monitor all patient implementation, and record each patient status. Provision of expert system elements via expert inputs and document-driven language analysis may ensure that recommendations generated by diagnostic engine 108 are backed by the very best medical knowledge and practices in the world. Models and/or learners with access to data in depth may enable generation of recommendations that are directly personalized for each patient, providing complete confidence, mitigated risk, and complete transparency. Access to well-organized and personalized knowledge in depth may greatly enhance efficiency of medical visits; in embodiments, a comprehensive visit may be completed in as little as 10 minutes. Recommendations may further suggest follow up testing and/or therapy, ensuring an effective ongoing treatment and prognostic plan.

Referring again to FIG. 1, artificial intelligence advisory system 100 includes a plan generation module 112 operating on the at least a computing device 104. Plan generation module 112 may include any suitable hardware or hardware module. In an embodiment, plan generation module 112 is designed and configured to generate a comprehensive instruction set 116 associated with the user based on the diagnostic output. In an embodiment, comprehensive instruction set 116 is a data structure containing instructions to be provided to the user to explain the user's current prognostic status, as reflected by one or more prognostic outputs and provide the user with a plan based on the at least an ameliorative output, to achieve that. Comprehensive instruction set 116 may include but is not limited to a program, strategy, summary, recommendation, or any other type of interactive platform that may be configured to comprise information associated with the user, an applicable verified external source, and one or more outputs derived from the analyses performed on the extraction from the user. Comprehensive instruction set 116 may describe to a user a future prognostic status to aspire to.

Referring now to FIG. 10, an exemplary embodiment of a plan generation module 112 is illustrated. Comprehensive instruction set 116 includes at least a current prognostic descriptor 1000 which as used in this disclosure is an element of data describing a current prognostic status based on at least one prognostic output. Plan generation module 112 may produce at least a current prognostic descriptor 1000 using at least a prognostic output. In an embodiment, plan generation module 112 may include a label synthesizer 1004. Label synthesizer 1004 may include any suitable software or hardware module. In an embodiment, label synthesizer 1004 may be designed and configured to combine a plurality of labels in at least a prognostic output together to provide maximally efficient data presentation. Combination of labels together may include elimination of duplicate information. For instance, label synthesizer 1004 and/or at least a computing device 104 may be designed and configure to determine a first prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label is a duplicate of a second prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label and eliminate the first prognostic label. Determination that a first prognostic label is a duplicate of a second prognostic label may include determining that the first prognostic label is identical to the second prognostic label; for instance, a prognostic label generated from test data presented in one biological extraction of at least a biological extraction may be the same as a prognostic label generated from test data presented in a second biological extraction of at least a biological extraction. As a further non-limiting example, a first prognostic label may be synonymous with a second prognostic label, where detection of synonymous labels may be performed, without limitation, by a language processing module 216 as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 10, label synthesizer 1004 may group prognostic labels according to one or more classification systems relating the prognostic labels to each other. For instance, plan generation module 112 and/or label synthesizer 1004 may be configured to determine that a first prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label and a second prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label belong to a shared category. A shared category may be a category of conditions or tendencies toward a future condition to which each of first prognostic label and second prognostic label belongs; as an example, lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity may each be examples of digestive sensitivity, for instance, which may in turn share a category with food sensitivities, food allergies, digestive disorders such as celiac disease and diverticulitis, or the like. Shared category and/or categories may be associated with prognostic labels as well. A given prognostic label may belong to a plurality of overlapping categories. Plan generation module 112 may be configured to add a category label associated with a shared category to comprehensive instruction set 116, where addition of the label may include addition of the label and/or a datum linked to the label, such as a textual or narrative description. In an embodiment, relationships between prognostic labels and categories may be retrieved from a prognostic label classification database 1008, for instance by generating a query using one or more prognostic labels of at least a prognostic output, entering the query, and receiving one or more categories matching the query from the prognostic label classification database 1008.

Referring now to FIG. 11, an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label classification database 1008 is illustrated. Prognostic label classification database 1008 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a symptomatic classification table 1100; symptomatic classification table 1100 may relate each prognostic label to one or more categories of symptoms associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, symptomatic classification table 1100 may include records indicating that each of lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity results in symptoms including gas buildup, bloating, and abdominal pain. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a systemic classification table 1104; systemic classification table 1104 may relate each prognostic label to one or more systems associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, systemic classification table 1104 may include records indicating each of lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity affects the digestive system; two digestive sensitivities linked to allergic or other immune responses may additionally be linked in systemic classification table 1104 to the immune system. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a body part classification table 1108; body part classification table 1108 may relate each prognostic label to one or more body parts associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, body part classification table 1108 may include records indicating each of psoriasis and rosacea affects the skin of a person. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a causal classification table 1112; causal classification table 1112 may relate each prognostic label to one or more causes associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, causal classification table 1112 may include records indicating each of type 2 diabetes and hypertension may have obesity as a cause. The above-described tables, and entries therein, are provided solely for exemplary purposes. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples for tables and/or relationships that may be included or recorded in prognostic classification table consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 10, plan generation module 112 may be configured to generate current prognostic descriptor 1000 by converting one or more prognostic labels into narrative language. As a non-limiting example, plan generation module 112 may include a narrative language unit 1012, which may be configured to determine an element of narrative language associated with at least a prognostic label and include the element of narrative language in current prognostic label descriptor. Narrative language unit 1012 may implement this, without limitation, by using a language processing module 216 to detect one or more associations between prognostic labels, or lists of prognostic labels, and phrases and/or statements of narrative language. Alternatively or additionally, narrative language unit 1012 may retrieve one or more elements of narrative language from a narrative language database 1016, which may contain one or more tables associating prognostic labels and/or groups of prognostic labels with words, sentences, and/or phrases of narrative language. One or more elements of narrative language may be included in comprehensive instruction set 116, for instance for display to a user as text describing a current prognostic status of the user. Current prognostic descriptor 1000 may further include one or more images; one or more images may be retrieved by plan generation module 112 from an image database 1020, which may contain one or more tables associating prognostic labels, groups of prognostic labels, current prognostic descriptors 1000, or the like with one or more images.

With continued reference to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set 116 may include one or more follow-up suggestions, which may include, without limitation, suggestions for acquisition of an additional biological extraction; in an embodiment, additional biological extraction may be provided to diagnostic engine 108, which may trigger repetition of one or more processes as described above, including without limitation generation of prognostic output, refinement or elimination of ambiguous prognostic labels of prognostic output, generation of ameliorative output, and/or refinement or elimination of ambiguous ameliorative labels of ameliorative output. For instance, where a pegboard test result suggests possible diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, ALS, and MS as described above, follow-up suggestions may include suggestions to perform endocrinal tests, genetic tests, and/or electromyographic tests; results of such tests may eliminate one or more of the possible diagnoses, such that a subsequently displayed output only lists conditions that have not been eliminated by the follow-up test. Follow-up tests may include any receipt of any biological extraction as described above.

With continued reference to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set may include one or more elements of contextual information, including without limitation any patient medical history such as current lab results, a current reason for visiting a medical professional, current status of one or more currently implemented treatment plans, biographical information concerning the patient, and the like. One or more elements of contextual information may include goals a patient wishes to achieve with a medical visit or session, and/or as result of interaction with diagnostic engine 108. Contextual information may include one or more questions a patient wishes to have answered in a medical visit and/or session, and/or as a result of interaction with diagnostic engine 108. Contextual information may include one or more questions to ask a patient. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms of contextual information that may be included, consistently with this disclosure.

With continued reference to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set 116 may include at least a future prognostic descriptor 1024. As used herein, a future prognostic descriptor 1024 is an element of data describing a future prognostic status based on at least one prognostic output, which may include without limitation a desired further prognostic status. In an embodiment, future prognostic descriptor 1024 may include any element suitable for inclusion in current prognostic descriptor 1000. Future prognostic descriptor 1024 may be generated using any processes, modules, and/or components suitable for generation of current prognostic descriptor 1000 as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 10, Comprehensive instruction set 116 includes at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028, which as defined in this disclosure an element of data describing one or more ameliorative processes to be followed based on at least one ameliorative output; at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028 may include descriptors for ameliorative processes usable to achieve future prognostic descriptor 1024. Plan generation module 112 may produce at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028 using at least a prognostic output. In an embodiment, label synthesizer 1004 may be designed and configured to combine a plurality of labels in at least an ameliorative output together to provide maximally efficient data presentation. Combination of labels together may include elimination of duplicate information. For instance, label synthesizer 1004 and/or at least a computing device 104 may be designed and configure to determine a first ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label is a duplicate of a second ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label and eliminate the first ameliorative label. Determination that a first ameliorative label is a duplicate of a second ameliorative label may include determining that the first ameliorative label is identical to the second ameliorative label; for instance, a ameliorative label generated from test data presented in one biological extraction of at least a biological extraction may be the same as a ameliorative label generated from test data presented in a second biological extraction of at least a biological extraction. As a further non-limiting example, a first ameliorative label may be synonymous with a second ameliorative label, where detection of synonymous labels may be performed, without limitation, by a language processing module 216 as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 10, label synthesizer 1004 may group ameliorative labels according to one or more classification systems relating the ameliorative labels to each other. For instance, plan generation module 112 and/or label synthesizer 1004 may be configured to determine that a first ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label and a second ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label belong to a shared category. A shared category may be a category of conditions or tendencies toward a future condition to which each of first ameliorative label and second ameliorative label belongs; as an example, lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity may each be examples of digestive sensitivity, for instance, which may in turn share a category with food sensitivities, food allergies, digestive disorders such as celiac disease and diverticulitis, or the like. Shared category and/or categories may be associated with ameliorative labels as well. A given ameliorative label may belong to a plurality of overlapping categories. Plan generation module 112 may be configured to add a category label associated with a shared category to comprehensive instruction set 116, where addition of the label may include addition of the label and/or a datum linked to the label, such as a textual or narrative description. In an embodiment, relationships between ameliorative labels and categories may be retrieved from an ameliorative label classification database 1032, for instance by generating a query using one or more ameliorative labels of at least an ameliorative output, entering the query, and receiving one or more categories matching the query from the ameliorative label classification database 1032.

Referring now to FIG. 12, an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative label classification database 1032 is illustrated. Ameliorative label classification database 1032 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, an intervention category table 1200; intervention 1200 may relate each ameliorative label to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, intervention category table 1200 may include records indicating that each of a plan to consume a given quantity of almonds and a plan to consume less meat maps to a category of nutritional instruction, while a plan to jog for 30 minutes per day maps to a category of activity. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, a nutrition category table 1204; nutrition category table 1204 may relate each ameliorative label pertaining to nutrition to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, nutrition category table 1204 may include records indicating that each of a plan to consume more almonds and a plan to consume more walnuts qualifies as a plan to consume more nuts, as well as a plan to consume more protein. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, an action category table 1208; action category table 1208 may relate each ameliorative label pertaining to an action to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, action category table 1208 may include records indicating that each of a plan jog for 30 minutes a day and a plan to perform a certain number of sit-ups per day qualifies as an exercise plan. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, a medication category table 1212; medication category table 1212 may relate each ameliorative label associated with a medication to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, medication category table 1212 may include records indicating that each of a plan to take an antihistamine and a plan to take an anti-inflammatory steroid belongs to a category of allergy medications. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, a supplement category table 1216; supplement category table 1216 may relate each ameliorative label pertaining to a supplement to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, supplement category table 1216 may include records indicating that each of a plan to consume a calcium supplement and a plan to consume a vitamin D supplement corresponds to a category of supplements to aid in bone density. Ameliorative labels may be mapped to each of nutrition category table 1204, action category table 1208, supplement category table 1216, and medication category table 1212 using intervention category table 1200. The above-described tables, and entries therein, are provided solely for exemplary purposes. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples for tables and/or relationships that may be included or recorded in ameliorative classification table consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 10, plan generation module 112 may be configured to generate ameliorative process descriptor 1028 by converting one or more ameliorative labels into narrative language. As a non-limiting example, plan generation module 112 may include a narrative language unit 1012, which may be configured to determine an element of narrative language associated with at least an ameliorative label and include the element of narrative language in current ameliorative label descriptor. Narrative language unit 1012 may implement this, without limitation, by using a language processing module 216 to detect one or more associations between ameliorative labels, or lists of ameliorative labels, and phrases and/or statements of narrative language. Alternatively or additionally, narrative language unit 1012 may retrieve one or more elements of narrative language from narrative language database 1016, which may contain one or more tables associating ameliorative labels and/or groups of ameliorative labels with words, sentences, and/or phrases of narrative language. One or more elements of narrative language may be included in comprehensive instruction set 116, for instance for display to a user as text describing a current ameliorative status of the user. Ameliorative process descriptor 1028 may further include one or more images; one or more images may be retrieved by plan generation module 112 from an image database 1020, which may contain one or more tables associating ameliorative labels, groups of ameliorative labels, ameliorative process descriptors 1028, or the like with one or more images.

Referring now to FIG. 13, and exemplary embodiment of a narrative language database 1016 is illustrated. Narrative language database 1016 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, a prognostic description table 1300, which may link prognostic labels to narrative descriptions associated with prognostic labels. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative description table 1304, which may link ameliorative process labels to narrative descriptions associated with ameliorative process labels. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, a combined description table 1308, which may link combinations of prognostic labels and ameliorative labels to narrative descriptions associated with the combinations. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, a narrative template table 1312, which may contain one or more templates of phrases, sentences, paragraphs, pages, reports, or the like into which images and text, such as images obtained from image database 1020 and text obtained from prognostic description table 1300, ameliorative description table 1304, and combined description table 1308 may be inserted. As a non-limiting example, a template may include a combination of words and/or phrases to be displayed as narrative language with one or more labels, variable names, or other indicators representing “blanks” to be filled in with numerical or textual values provided using diagnostic output elements; for instance, a template sentence may be rendered as “Your cholesterol levels are <CLVL>,” where “<CLVL>” is parsed by narrative language unit 1012 as an instruction to insert a variable containing a cholesterol level reading in place of “<CLVL>” in the narrative language generated using the template. Such labels, variable-insertion markers, or the like may be used to insert any numerical or textual datum from diagnostic output into any phrase, sentence, paragraph, page, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which templates and variables may be combined to generate narrative language as described in this disclosure. Tables in narrative description table 1016 may be populated, as a non-limiting example, using submissions from experts, which may be collected according to any processes described above. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various way sin which entries in narrative description table 1016 may be categorized and/or organized.

Referring now to FIG. 14, an exemplary embodiment of an image database 1020 is illustrated. Image database 1020 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in image database 102 may include, without limitation, a prognostic image table 1400, which may link prognostic labels to images associated with prognostic labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative image table 1404, which may link ameliorative process labels to images associated with ameliorative process labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, a combined description table 1408, which may link combinations of prognostic labels and ameliorative labels to images associated with the combinations. One or more database tables in image database 102 may include, without limitation, a prognostic video table 1412, which may link prognostic labels to videos associated with prognostic labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative video table 1416, which may link ameliorative process labels to videos associated with ameliorative process labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, a combined video table 1420, which may link combinations of prognostic labels and ameliorative labels to videos associated with the combinations. Tables in image database 1020 may be populated, without limitation, by submissions by experts, which may be provided according to any process or process steps described in this disclosure for collection of expert submissions.

Referring again to FIG. 10, plan generation module 112 may be configured to receive at least an element of user data and filter diagnostic output using the at least an element of user data. At least an element of user data, as used herein, is any element of data describing the user, user needs, and/or user preferences. At least an element of user data may include a constitutional restriction. At least a constitutional restriction may include any health-based reason that a user may be unable to engage in a given ameliorative process; at least a constitutional restriction may include any counter-indication as described above, including an injury, a diagnosis of something preventing use of one or more ameliorative processes, an allergy or food-sensitivity issue, a medication that is counter-indicated, or the like. At least an element of user data may include at least a user preference. At least a user preference may include, without limitation, any preference to engage in or eschew any ameliorative process and/or other potential elements of a comprehensive instruction set 116, including religious preferences such as forbidden foods, medical interventions, exercise routines, or the like.

Referring to FIG. 15, an exemplary embodiment of a user database 1036 is illustrated. User database 1036 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, a constitution restriction table 1500; at least a constitutional restriction may be linked to a given user and/or user identifier in a constitutional restriction table 1500. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, a user preference table 1504; at least a user preference may be linked to a given user and/or user identifier in a user preference table 1504. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, an informed advisor table 1508; informed advisor table 1508 may list one or more informed advisors, as described in further detail below, who are available to provide advice and/or services to user, and/or one or more informed advisors who have been selected to provide advice and/or services to the user. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, a prognostic label table 1512; prognostic label table 1512 may include one or more prognostic labels currently or previously associated with user, including without limitation one or more prognostic labels produced by diagnostic engine 108 using at least a biological extraction from the user and/or one or more prognostic labels provided by an informed advisor, medical professional, user medical records, or the user. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative process label table 1516; ameliorative process label table 1516 may include one or more ameliorative process labels currently and/or previously associated with user, including without limitation one or more ameliorative process labels produced by diagnostic engine 108 using at least a biological extraction from the user, and/or one or more ameliorative process labels provided and/or selected by the user, an informed advisor, a medical professional, and/or one or more medical records associated with the user. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, a profile information table 1520; profile information table may include any user profile information, including without limitation current and/or former residential, vacation, and/or mailing addresses, one or more telephone numbers, one or more email addresses, date of birth, family information, or the like.

Referring again to FIG. 1, artificial intelligence advisory system includes a client-interface module 120. Client-interface module 120 may include any suitable hardware or software module. Client-interface module 120 is designed and configured to transmit comprehensive instruction set 116 to at least a user client device 124 associated with the user. A user client device 124 may include, without limitation, a display in communication with diagnostic engine 108; display may include any display as described below in reference to FIG. 23. A user client device 124 may include an addition computing device, such as a mobile device, laptop, desktop computer, or the like; as a non-limiting example, the user client device 124 may be a computer and/or workstation operated by a medical professional. Output may be displayed on at least a user client device 124 using an output graphical user interface; output graphical user interface may display at least a current prognostic descriptor 1000, at least a future prognostic descriptor 1024, and/or at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, artificial intelligence advisory system includes at least an advisory module executing on the at least a computing device 104. At least an advisory module may include any suitable hardware or software module. In an embodiment, at least an advisory module is designed and configured to generate at least an advisory output as a function of the comprehensive instruction set 116 and transmit the advisory output to at least an advisor client device 136. At least an advisor client device 136 may include any device suitable for use as a user client device 124 as described above. At least an advisor client device 136 may be a user client device 124 as described above; that is, at least an advisory output may be output to the user client device 124. Alternatively or additionally, at least an advisor client device 136 may be operated by an informed advisor, defined for the purposes of this disclosure as any person besides the user who has access to information useable to aid user in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory system. An informed advisor may include, without limitation, a medical professional such as a doctor, nurse, nurse practitioner, functional medicine practitioner, any professional with a career in medicine, nutrition, genetics, fitness, life sciences, insurance, and/or any other applicable industry that may contribute information and data to system 100 regarding medical needs. An informed advisor may include a spiritual or philosophical advisor, such as a religious leader, pastor, imam, rabbi, or the like. An informed advisor may include a physical fitness advisor, such as without limitation a personal trainer, instructor in yoga or martial arts, sports coach, or the like.

Referring now to FIG. 16, an exemplary embodiment of an advisory module 132 is illustrated. Advisory module 132 may be configured to generate an advisor instruction set 1600 as a function of the diagnostic output. Advisory instruction set 1600 may contain any element suitable for inclusion in comprehensive instruction set 116; advisory instruction set 1600 and/or any element thereof may be generated using any process suitable for generation of comprehensive instruction set 116. Advisory instruction set 1600 may include one or more specialized instructions 1604; specialized instructions, as used herein, are instructions the contents of which are selected for display to a particular informed advisor. Selection of instructions for a particular informed advisor may be obtained, without limitation, from information concerning the particular informed advisor, which may be retrieved from a user database 1036 or the like. As a non-limiting example, where an informed advisor is a doctor, specialized instruction 1604 may include data from biological extraction as described above; specialized instruction may include one or more medical records of user, which may, as a non-limiting example, be downloaded or otherwise received from an external database containing medical records and/or a database (not shown) operating on at least a computing device 104. As a further non-limiting example medical data relevant to fitness, such as orthopedic reports, may be provided to an informed advisor whose role is as a fitness instructor, coach, or the like. Information provided to informed advisors may be extracted or received from any database described herein, including without limitation biological extraction database 300.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 is configured to receive at least a user input from a user client device. At least a user input includes any of the user inputs as described herein. Advisory module 132 evaluates the content of a user input to identify a theme of conversation. A “theme of conversation,” as used in this disclosure, is any topic and/or subject identified within a user input. A subject may include for example self-help, such as when a user may seek help with improving one's emotions. A subject may include for example, a symptom that a user complains about, such as dry, itchy, and scratchy eyes that a user experiences upon waking. A symptom may include questions about a disorder that a user was recently diagnosed with, such as a user who was recently diagnosed with a gluten intolerance and has a question if a product containing corn contains gluten. A subject may include a medication such as prescription medication or supplement that the user is currently taking or recently was given a prescription for and the user has a question or comment about the medication. A subject may include an addiction problem that the user is seeking encouragement and support to encourage the user to stop drinking alcohol, or to stop a gambling addiction. A subject may include a need for a particular wellness service, such as a need to speak with a medical doctor, a need to schedule an appointment at a fertility clinic, a need to ask a particular informed advisor a question, such as a chiropractor or physical therapist.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 may evaluate the content of user input to identify a theme of conversation by generating a classifier. Computing device 104 may generate a classifier using a classification algorithm, defined as a process whereby a computing device 104 derives, from training data, a model known as a “classifier,” for sorting inputs into categories or bins of data. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers. In an embodiment, classifier utilizes a user input as an input, and outputs utilizing a classification algorithm a theme of conversation.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 identifies a theme of conversation using a user behavior learner configured to identify the theme of conversation using previous user behaviors. Behavior learner may include any form of machine-learning learner as described above, implementing any form of language processing and/or machine learning. In an embodiment, behavior learner may be a learner that derives relationships between user behaviors and previous user inputs and correct outputs using a training set that includes, without limitation, a corpus of previously identified themes of conversation. Corpus of previously identified themes of conversation and/or previous user behaviors may be logged by at least a computing device 104 as behaviors take place, and/or as user inputs are generated. For example, previous user inputs that relate to a series of user inputs about a medication a user has been taking may be related to a theme of conversation related to the medication. Computing device 104 may consult this previously identified theme of conversation to determine if new user inputs relate to the same previously identified theme related to the medication.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 identifies a theme of conversation utilizing a questionnaire completed by a user. A “questionnaire,” as used in this disclosure, is a series of questions or other types of prompts for the purpose of gathering information from a user. A questionnaire may be generated based on expert input contained within expert knowledge database. A questionnaire may include one or more self-assessment questions that aid and/or guide a user to identify the subject and/or topic of the input generated by the user. A questionnaire may consist of questions where the user may select an answer from a list of several answers. A questionnaire may consist of open ended questions, where a user may enter an answer in the user's own words and thoughts. In an embodiment, a user may complete a questionnaire and generate answers utilizing user client device. In an embodiment, a user may complete a questionnaire by entering one or more answers on graphical user interface located on computing device 104.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, advisory module 132 is configured to evaluate the content of a use input and identify an alert condition. An “alert condition,” as used in this disclosure, is any situation that needs immediate attention and/or consultation with an informed advisor. For example, an alert condition may include a situation where a user is seeking advice to determine if the user's ankle is broken and if the user needs to go to the emergency room to seek immediate medical attention. In yet another non-limiting condition, an alert condition may include a situation where a user is feeling very depressed and unwell and contemplating suicidal thoughts. In yet another non-limiting example, an alert condition may include a situation where a user is having an allergic reaction to a medication or food and seeks to ask an informed advisor such as a physician what the user should do. One or more alert conditions may be identified based on information contained within expert knowledge database. For example, experts may provide inputs identifying situations the expert has encountered and/or has experience with treating that are considered alert conditions. Advisor module 132 transmits the content of a user input containing an alert condition to an advisory client device. This may allow an informed advisor to get in touch with the user and triage the alert condition. In an embodiment, upon review of the user input containing an alert condition, an informed advisor may get in touch with a user and consult the user such as through text messaging or over the phone. In an embodiment, upon review of the user input containing an alert condition, an informed advisor may claim that the alert condition is really not an alert condition, and may provide a recommendation or suggestion to the user.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 is configured to locate an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing an identified theme of conversation. An advisor client device includes any of the advisor client devices as described herein. In an embodiment, advisory module 132 locates an advisory client device operated by an informed advisor who may be best suited and/or a specialist designed to help a user based on a theme of conversation identified contained within a user input. For example, a user input that relates to a theme of conversation related to an issue about the user's foot, may be utilized to locate an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor who specializes in podiatry. In an embodiment, advisory module 132 may locate an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor who may be within a certain geographical area or location of a user, incase an in person meeting may be warranted at a later time. Advisory module 132 may locate advisors who may be specialists in certain areas based on information contained within expert knowledge database about a certain advisor. For example, an informed advisor may supply information to expert knowledge database specifying what specialties and/or areas of expertise an informed advisor may be skilled in.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, advisory module 132 is configured to locate a first advisor client device operated by a first informed advisor. Advisory module 132 may locate a first advisor client device utilizing any of the methodologies as described herein. Advisory module 132 may determine that thee first advisor client device is not active. An advisor client device may be not active such as when the informed advisor is unable to provide consultation services, when the informed advisor is not taking any new clients, when the informed advisor is currently at the present moment consulting with another client, when the informed advisor is on vacation or outside of normal working hours and the like. In an embodiment, computing device 104 may mark an advisor client device as not active when the informed advisor has had disciplinary action taken against themselves, such as for example an informed advisor who's license to practice medicine has been suspended or when an informed advisor has retired from working anymore, and the like. Advisory module 132 locates a second advisor client device operated by a second informed advisor and determines the second advisor client device is active. An advisor client device is active when the informed advisor is able to provide consultation services, when the informed advisor is currently taking new clients and the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 is configured to receive a user input containing a user identifier. A “user identifier” as used in this disclosure, includes any combination of one or more characters, numbers, and/or symbols that uniquely identify a user. For example, a user identifier may include a medical record number or a unique string of letters and numbers uniquely assigned only to a user. In an embodiment, a user identifier may be generated in a manner so that any identifying information about a user has been removed, and instead a user is only identifiable by a numerical identifier or special code. Advisory module 132 compares a user identifier to a user identifier stored within computing device 104. In an embodiment, a user identifier may be stored within biological extraction database 300. In an embodiment, a user identifier stored within computing device 104 may be stored in an encrypted format whereby the user identifier may have been converted into a code to prevent unauthorized access. Encrypted format may include using an algorithm and/or series of algorithms to transform plaintext stored user datums into ciphertext that may only be viewed in its original form by decrypting it using a correct decryption key. Encrypted format may include both symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys such as for example, public and private key pairs. Encrypted format may include for example, end-to-end encryption to allow encrypted sharing of a user identifier such as for example, sharing a user identifier between a user computing device located at user's home and an informed advisor's computing device located at a hospital. In an embodiment, a user identifier may be stored, transmitted, and/or accessed in a manner that complies with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) of 1996. In an embodiment, access to a user identifier by anyone other than the user, such as informed advisors, health care proxies of user, other medical professionals, and/or organizations may have to have access granted. In an embodiment, access to at least a stored user identifier may be granted using two step authentication, whereby two steps may be taken to verify that a user requesting access to a user identifier has permission to access a stored user identifier and/or any information about a user and is who they say they are. For example, a two-step authentication may include entering a password and having a password sent to a device controlled by the individual trying to gain access. In an embodiment, access may be granted to a user identifier using multi-step verification, two-factor authentication, and/or multi-factor authentication. In an embodiment, authentication may include biometric authentication of a user and/or individual seeking to gain access to a stored user identifier. Biometric authentication may include unique biological characteristics that may be utilized to verify a user. In an embodiment, biometric authentication may compare a measured biometric such as by sensor and compare it to previously received and accurately confirmed biometric readings contained in a database. In such an instance, if both samples of the biometric data match, then authentication may be confirmed. In an embodiment, biometric authentication may comprise one factor of authentication in a two-factor authentication and/or multi-factor authentication. Advisory module 132 authenticates a user identifier, such as by ensuring that a user identifier received with a user input matches and is the same as the user identifier stored within computing device 104. Authenticating may ensure confirming the identify of a user, and ensuring that a user input has been generated by a user who's identify can be confirmed within computing device 104.

In an embodiment, and continuing to refer to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 may be configured to receive at least an advisory input from the advisor client device 136. At least an advisory input may include any information provided by an informed advisor via advisor client device 136. Advisory input may include medical information and/or advice. Advisory input may include user data, including user habits, preferences, religious affiliations, constitutional restrictions, or the like. Advisory input may include spiritual and/or religious advice. Advisory input may include user-specific diagnostic information. Advisory input may be provided to user client device 124; alternatively or additionally, advisory input may be fed back into system 100, including without limitation insertion into user database 1036, inclusion in or use to update diagnostic engine 108, for instance by augmenting machine-learning models and/or modifying machine-learning outputs via a lazy-learning protocol or the like as described above. Advisory module 132 may be configured to receive at least a user input from a user client device 124. At least a user input may include any textual input a user may provide to a computing device, including without limitation a question regarding and/or description of a symptom, a treatment, an activity, a food, a medication, a medical procedure, an exercise, an exercise program, a supplement, and/or any informed advisor; at least a user input may include any combination of any such questions and/or descriptions. By way of illustration, and without limitation, a user may enter an input stating that the user's foot is hurting, asking what it means if your eyes are bloodshot, asking if the user can have a piece of cake, asking whether the user should participate in an athletic event, or the like. At least a user input may be entered by the user in any suitable way, including without limitation by typing a textual input, providing a voice input, which may be converted to textual data via a voice-to-text program, or the like. Advisory module 132 may be configured to transmit at least a textual output to a user client device 124; at least a textual output may include any textual data, including without limitation an answer to a user, which may be generated as set forth in further detail below. At least a textual output may be output to a user in any suitable way, including display on a screen, text-to-speech audio output, or the like. Receipt of at least a user input and/or transmission of at least a textual output maybe performed repeatedly and/or iteratively; for instance, receipt of user inputs and provision of textual outputs may be performed multiple times during a conversation between user and advisory module 132.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 may include an artificial intelligence advisor 1608 configured to perform a user textual conversation with the user client device 124. Artificial intelligence advisor 1608 may provide output to advisor client device 136 and/or user client device 124. Artificial intelligence advisor 1608 may receive inputs from advisor client device 136 and/or user client device 124. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms. Artificial intelligence advisor 1608 is configured to generate at least a textual output using diagnostic output and at least a user input, as set forth in further detail below.

Referring now to FIG. 17, an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisor 1608 is illustrated. In an embodiment, artificial intelligence advisor includes a parsing module 1704 configured to generate at least a query using the at least a user input. At least a query, as used in this disclosure, is at least a datum used to retrieve text that will be incorporated in at least a textual output, where retrieval may be effected by inputting the at least a query into a data structure, database, and/or model, and receiving a corresponding output as a result, for example as set forth in further detail below. Parsing module 1704 may generate at least a query by extracting one or more words or phrases from the input, and/or analyzing one or more words or phrases; extraction and/or analysis may include tokenization, for instance as described above in relation to language processing module 216. In an embodiment, parsing module 1704 may utilize, incorporate, or be a language processing module 216 as described above. Language processing module 216 may be configured to map at least a user input to at least a query, using any process as described above for a language processing module 216. Extraction and/or analysis may further involve polarity classification, in which parsing module 1704 may determine, for instance, whether a phrase or sentence is a negation of the semantic content thereof, or a positive recitation of the semantic content; as a non-limiting example, polarity classification may enable parsing module 1704 to determine that “my feet hurt” has a divergent meaning, or the opposite meaning, of the phrase “my feet don't hurt.” Polarity classification may be performed, without limitation, by consultation of a database of words that negate sentences, and/or geometrically within a vector space, where a negation of a given phrase may be distant from the non-negated version of the same phrase according to norms such as cosine similarity.

Still referring to FIG. 17, parsing module 1704 may be configured to normalize one or more words or phrases of user input, where normalization signifies a process whereby one or more words or phrases are modified to match corrected or canonical forms; for instance, misspelled words may be modified to correctly spelled versions, words with alternative spellings may be converted to spellings adhering to a selected standard, such as American or British spellings, capitalizations and apostrophes may be corrected, and the like; this may be performed by reference to one or more “dictionary” data structures listing correct spellings and/or common misspellings and/or alternative spellings, or the like. Parsing module 1704 may perform algorithms for named entity recognition. Named entity recognition may include a process whereby names of users, names of informed advisors such as doctors, medical professionals, coaches, trainers, family members or the like, addresses, place names, entity names, or the like are identified; this may be performed, without limitation, by searching for words and/or phrases in user database. For instance, parsing module 1704 may identify at least a phrase, which may include one or more words, map the at least a phrase to at least a query element, and then assemble a query using the at least a query element. Mapping at least a phrase to at least a query element may be performed using any language processing technique described in this disclosure, including vector similarity techniques.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, parsing module 1704 may extract and/or analyze one or more words or phrases by performing dependency parsing processes; a dependency parsing process may be a process whereby parsing module 1704 and/or a language processing module 216 communicating with and/or incorporated in parsing module 1704 recognizes a sentence or clause and assigns a syntactic structure to the sentence or clause. Dependency parsing may include searching for or detecting syntactic elements such as subjects, objects, predicates or other verb-based syntactic structures, common phrases, nouns, adverbs, adjectives, and the like; such detected syntactic structures may be related to each other using a data structure and/or arrangement of data corresponding, as a non-limiting example, to a sentence diagram, parse tree, or similar representation of syntactic structure. Parsing module 1704 may be configured, as part of dependency parsing, to generate a plurality of representations of syntactic structure, such as a plurality of parse trees, and select a correct representation from the plurality; this may be performed, without limitation, by use of syntactic disambiguation parsing algorithms such as, without limitation, Cocke-Kasami-Younger (CKY), Earley algorithm or Chart parsing algorithms. Disambiguation may alternatively or additionally be performed by comparison to representations of syntactic structures of similar phrases as detected using vector similarity, by reference to machine-learning algorithms and/or modules such as without limitation a user communication learner 1804 as described below, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 17, parsing module 1704 may combine separately analyzed elements from at least a user input together to form a single query; elements may include words, phrases, sentences, or the like, as described above. For instance, two elements may have closely related meanings as detected using vector similarity or the like; as a further non-limiting example, a first element may be determined to modify and/or have a syntactic dependency on a second element, using dependency analysis or similar processes as described above. Combination into a query may include, without limitation, concatenation. Alternatively or additionally, parsing module 1704 may detect two or more queries in a single user input of at least a user input; for instance, parsing module 1704 may extract a conversational query and an informational query from a single user input. An informational query, as used in this disclosure, is a query used to retrieve one or more elements of factual information; one or more elements may include, without limitation, any data suitable for use as a prognostic label, an ameliorative process label, and/or biological extraction data as described above. One or more elements may include an identity of a category of a prognostic label, ameliorative process label, biological extraction datum, informed advisor, or the like. One or more elements may include an identity of any factual element, including an identity of a place, person, informed advisor, user, entity, or the like. A conversational query, as used herein, is a query used to generate a textual response and/or response form, such as an overall sentence structure, templates, words, and/or phrases such as those usable for entries in narrative language database as described above, for inclusion of information returned in response to an informational query, for a response to a question, comment, phrase, or sentence that is not in itself a request for information, and/or for a request for clarification and/or more information as described in further detail below. A conversational query may include one or more pattern-matching elements, such as regular expressions, “wildcards,” or the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, parsing module 1704 may be configured to convert at least a query into at least a canonical or standard form of query; for instance, and without limitation, once a query has been detected, parsing module 1704 may convert it to a highly closely related query based on vector similarity, where the highly closely related query is labeled as a standard form or canonical query. In an embodiment, converting to a standard form query may enable more efficient processing of queries as described below, as a reduced space of potential queries may be used to retrieve conversational and/or informational responses.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 17, artificial intelligence advisor may include a processing module 1708 configured to generate the at least a textual output as a function of the at least a query. Referring now to FIG. 18, an exemplary embodiment of a processing module 1708 is illustrated. In an embodiment, processing module 1708 may be configured to determine that the at least a query includes a conversational language query and generate a conversational response using the conversational language query. In an embodiment, and as a non-limiting example, processing module 1708 may be configured to generate the conversational response by retrieving at least a datum from a conversational resource, which for purposes of this disclosure is a data structure, database, data store, and/or data module that returns data usable to generate a conversational response when queried using a conversational language query. A conversational resource may include a default response database 1800; for instance, processing module 1708 may be configured to retrieve at least a datum from a default response database 1800 using a conversational language query, and generate the conversational response using the at least a datum. Default response database 1800 may link inputs to outputs according to initial relationships entered by users, including without limitation experts as described above, and/or as created by a previous instance or version of general learner and/or user-specific learner. Default response database 1800 may periodically be updated with information from newly generated instances machine-learning models and/or modules, or other components of artificial intelligence advisor 1608. Inputs received by artificial intelligence advisor 1608 may be mapped to canonical and/or representative inputs by synonym detection as performed, for instance, by a language processing module 216; language processing module 216 may be involved in textual analysis and/or generation of text at any other point in machine-learning and/or communication processes undergone by artificial intelligence advisor 1608.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, artificial intelligence advisor is configured to match a theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process. A “repository response,” as used in this disclosure, includes a plurality of textual outputs related to a theme of conversation. Textual outputs may include replies, follow up questions, an answer to a question, and/or any other act of continuing a conversational exchange with a user. One or more repository responses may be stored in a database located within system 100. In an embodiment, a repository response may contain a flow of conversations that may be selected and utilized to respond to a user input. For example, a user input seeking advice about a side effect of a particular medication, may be utilized to select a repository response relating to the medication, and that contains a response to the side effect of the medication. In yet another non-limiting example, a user input seeking to know the best stretches for tight calf muscles may be utilized to find a repository response that contains a response containing a series of exercises that a user can perform to loosen up tight calf muscles.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, artificial intelligence advisor matches a theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process. A first machine-learning process includes any of the machine-learning processes as described herein. A first machine-learning process may include generating a behavior classifier. A “behavior classifier,” as used in this disclosure, is any classifier that utilizes a theme of conversation as an input into a behavior classifier, and outputs a repository response using a classification algorithm. A classification algorithm includes any of the classification algorithms as described above in more detail. In an embodiment, a first machine-learning process may include generating a clustering algorithm. A clustering algorithm may include for example, automatic clustering algorithms, balanced clustering, clustering high-dimensional data, conceptual clustering, consensus clustering, constrained clustering, k-means clustering, mean-shift clustering, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), expectation-maximization (EM) clustering using Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), agglomerative hierarchical clustering, and the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, artificial intelligence advisor selects a textual output contained within a repository response. In an embodiment, textual outputs may be organized in a sequential sequence within a repository response. Artificial intelligence advisor may select a textual output that follows the sequential sequence. In yet another non-limiting example, artificial intelligence advisor may select a textual output contained within a repository response based on information contained within expert knowledge database. Artificial intelligence advisor transmits a textual output to a user client device. Artificial intelligence advisor transmits the textual output utilizing any network methodology as described herein.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, artificial intelligence advisor is configured to generate a textual output wherein the textual output contains a conference initiator. A “conference initiator,” as used in this disclosure, includes any program that allows a user and an informed advisor to initiate a textual conversation with one another. A conference initiator may include for example, short message service (SMS), multimedia messaging service (MMS), enhanced messaging service (EMS), rich communication services (RCS), short message service technical realization (GSM), short message service center (SMSC), text messaging and the like. Artificial intelligence advisor transmits a conference initiator to a user client device and an advisor client device, and facilitates a conversation between the user client device and the advisor client device utilizing the conference initiator. Conference initiator may be facilitated utilizing any network methodology as described herein.

Referring now to FIG. 19, an exemplary embodiment of a default response database 1800 is illustrated. Default response database 1800 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in default response database 1800 may include, without limitation, an input/output table 1900, which may link default inputs to default outputs. Default response database 1800 may include a user table 1904, which may, for instance, map users and/or a user client device 124 to particular user-specific learners and/or past conversations. Default response database 1800 may include a user preference table 1908 listing preferred modes of address, turns of phrase, or other user-specific communication preferences. Default response database 1800 may include a general preference table 1912, which may track, for instance, output-input pairings associated with greater degrees of user satisfaction. Where multiple records and/or responses may be retrieved from default response database 1800, processing module 1708 may relate such records hierarchically, for instance using hierarchical pattern-matching programs.

Referring again to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 and/or a conversational resource may include a user communication learner 1804 configured to generate the at least a conversational response using the conversational language query. Referring now to FIG. 20, an exemplary embodiment of a user communication learner 1804 is illustrated. User communication learner 1804 may include any form of machine-learning learner as described above, implementing any form of language processing and/or machine learning. In an embodiment, user communication learner 1804 may include a general learner 2000; general learner 2000 may be a learner that derives relationships between a conversational query 2004 and correct outputs using a training set that includes, without limitation, a corpus 2008 of previous conversations. Corpus 2008 of previous conversations may be logged by at least a computing device 104 as conversations take place; user feedback, and/or one or more functions indicating degree of success of a conversation may be used to differentiate between positive input-output pairs to use for training and negative input-output pairs not to use for training. Outputs may include textual strings and/or outputs from any databases, modules, and/or learners as described in this disclosure, including without limitation prognostic labels, prognostic descriptors, ameliorative labels, ameliorative descriptors, user information, or the like; for instance, general learner may determine that some inputs optimally map to textual response outputs, while other inputs map to outputs created by retrieval of module and/or database outputs, such as retrieval of prognostic descriptors, ameliorative descriptors, or the like. General learner 2000 may include any elements suitable for use in any machine-learning module and/or learner as described in this description, including without limitation an unsupervised learning module 2012 and/or a supervised learning module 2016. General learner 2000 may generate a general model 2020 relating conversational inputs to conversational outputs, which may be used to generate conversational outputs; this may be implemented according to any process for implementing machine-learning models and/or language learning models as described in this disclosure. Alternatively or additionally, general learner 2000 may include a lazy learning module 2024. Lazy learning module 2024 may be implemented according to any description in this disclosure for implementation of lazy learning modules.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, user communication learner 1804 may include a user-specific learner 2028, which may generate one or more modules that learn input-output pairs pertaining to communication with a particular user; a user specific learner may initially use input-output pairs established by general learner 2000 and may modify such pairs to match optimal conversation with the particular user by iteratively minimizing an error function. User-specific learner 2028 may include any elements suitable for use in any machine-learning module and/or learner as described in this description, including without limitation an unsupervised learning module 2032 and/or a supervised learning module 2036. User-specific learner 2028 may generate a user-specific model 2040 relating conversational inputs to conversational outputs, which may be used to generate conversational outputs; this may be implemented according to any process for implementing machine-learning models and/or language learning models as described in this disclosure. Alternatively or additionally, user-specific learner 2028 may include a lazy learning module 2044. General learner 2000 and/or user-specific learner 2028 may initialize, prior to training, using one or more records retrieved from default response database 1800 as described above.

Referring again to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 may be further configured to determine that the at least a query includes an informational query and generate an informational response using the informational query. This may be performed, as a non-limiting example, by user communication learner 1804, which use corpus to relate queries to labels identifying conversational queries or informational queries. Alternatively or additionally, parsing module 1704 may provide processing module 1708 information indicating that a query is a conversational query and/or an informational query. Generation of an informational response may be accomplished by retrieving at least a datum from an informational resource, which for purposes of this disclosure is a data structure, database, data store, and/or data module that returns data usable to generate an informational response when queried using an informational query. For instance, and without limitation, processing module 1708 may be configured to retrieve at least a datum from a diagnostic output using the informational query and generate the informational response using the at least a datum. As a non-limiting example, processing module 1708 may compare informational query to one or more textual elements in diagnostic output; comparison may be performed using any form of textual comparison and/or matching described above as performed by parsing module 1704, processing module 1708, and/or language processing module 216.

Still referring to FIG. 18, as a non-limiting example, where at least a user input describes and/or inquires concerning a symptom, processing module 1708 may compare textual description of the symptom to one or more textual descriptions of symptoms in diagnostic output and use the one or more textual descriptions to generate an informational response. As another non-limiting example, where at least a user input describes or inquires concerning a food, or another nutrition-related question or description, processing module 1708 may compare textual description of the food or nutrition-related question or description to one or more textual descriptions in diagnostic output relating to food and/or nutrition, and use the one or more textual descriptions to generate an informational response; one or more textual descriptions may include food and/or nutritional items that are recommended for the user and/or one or more food and/or nutritional items that are not recommended for the user, including without limitation any items to avoid due to a detected relationship to a prognostic label as determined by an ameliorative process label learner as described above, one or more counter-indications as described above, or any other recommendation not to consume the food and/or nutritional item as described in this disclosure. As another non-limiting example, where at least a user input describes or inquires concerning a supplement, processing module 1708 may compare textual description of the supplement to one or more textual descriptions in diagnostic output relating to supplements, and use the one or more textual descriptions to generate an informational response; one or more textual descriptions may include supplements that are recommended for the user and/or one or more supplements that are not recommended for the user, including without limitation any items to avoid due to a detected relationship to a prognostic label as determined by an ameliorative process label learner as described above, one or more counter-indications as described above, or any other recommendation not to consume the supplement as described in this disclosure

Continuing to refer to FIG. 18, where at least a user input describes or inquires concerning a medication, processing module 1708 may compare textual description of the medication to one or more textual descriptions in diagnostic output relating to medications, and use the one or more textual descriptions to generate an informational response; one or more textual descriptions may include one or more medications that are recommended for the user and/or one or more medications that are not recommended for the user, including without limitation any items to avoid due to a detected relationship to a prognostic label as determined by an ameliorative process label learner as described above, one or more counter-indications as described above, or any other recommendation not to consume the one or more medications as described in this disclosure. As a further non-limiting example, where at least a user input describes or inquires concerning an exercise or other fitness activity, processing module 1708 may compare textual description of the exercise or other fitness activity to one or more textual descriptions in diagnostic output relating to exercises and/or other fitness activities, and use the one or more textual descriptions to generate an informational response; one or more textual descriptions may include exercises and/or other fitness activities that are recommended for the user and/or one or more exercises and/or other fitness activities that are not recommended for the user, including without limitation any items to avoid due to a detected relationship to a prognostic label as determined by an ameliorative process label learner as described above, one or more counter-indications as described above, or any other recommendation not to engage in an exercise or other fitness activity as described in this disclosure. Informational response may further recommend an informed advisor, category of informed advisor, list of advisors, and/or ameliorative label based on the at least a user input.

Still referring to FIG. 18, generating the informational response using at least a datum from a diagnostic output may include generating the informational response and/or a portion thereof directly from the at least a datum; for instance, processing module 1708 may convert the at least a datum into narrative language, images, and/or videos using any element of plan generation module 112 as described above, and may incorporate the narrative language, images, and/or videos into the informational response. Alternatively or additionally, generating the informational response using at least a datum from a diagnostic output may include modifying the informational query using the at least a datum and performing any step described herein for generating an informational response from an informational query using the modified informational query.

With continued reference to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 may be configured to retrieve at least a datum from a user database using the informational query and generate the informational response using the at least a datum. For instance, and without limitation, user database may list one or more user preferences, constitutional restrictions, or the like, as described above. As a non-limiting example, processing module 1708 may retrieve an allergy, counter-indication for an exercise, medication, food, supplement, or the like, or other restriction from constitutional restriction table. As a further non-limiting example, processing module 1708 may retrieve one or more user preferences concerning an exercise, medication, food, supplement, or the like from a user preference table. Either retrieval may be performed using a modified informational query: for instance, user may submit an entry inquiring about a food, supplement, medication, or activity about which the user does not know one or more details, such as ingredients in food, supplements, or medication, and/or steps performed in an activity; processing module 1708 may retrieve such details and check them against user preferences table and constitutional restriction table. As a non-limiting example, where user has an allergy or religious prohibition against a particular ingredient that user does not know is in a particular food item, processing module 1708 may determine a list of ingredients, produce a modified informational query using the list of ingredients, and then retrieve the relevant constitutional restriction and/or religious prohibition from user database. Informational response may further recommend an informed advisor, category of informed advisor, list of advisors, and/or ameliorative label based on the at least a user input.

Still referring to FIG. 18, generating the informational response using at least a datum from a user database may include generating the informational response and/or a portion thereof directly from the at least a datum; for instance, processing module 1708 may convert the at least a datum into narrative language, images, and/or videos using any element of plan generation module 112 as described above, and may incorporate the narrative language, images, and/or videos into the informational response. Alternatively or additionally, generating the informational response using at least a datum from a user database may include modifying the informational query using the at least a datum and performing any step described herein for generating an informational response from an informational query using the modified informational query.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 may be further configured to retrieve a prognostic output from a prognostic label database 312 using the informational query and generate the informational response using the prognostic output. Alternatively or additionally, processing module 1708 may be configured to input the informational query to a prognostic label learner 236 operating on the at least a server, wherein the prognostic label learner is designed 236 and configured to generate at least a prognostic output as a function of a training set correlating physiological state data to prognostic labels and the informational query, receive, from the prognostic label learner 236, the at least a prognostic output, and generate the informational response using the at least a prognostic output. For instance, and without limitation, where user input describes one or more symptoms, processing module 1708 may submit an informational query including the one or more symptoms to prognostic label database and/or prognostic label learner 236; informational query may be converted to a form of biological extraction data using any processes or modules described above for arrangement of biological extraction data and/or physiological state data for use in prognostic label database 312, first training set, and/or as an input to prognostic label learner 236. The above is described for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples as consistent with this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 18, generating the informational response using one or more prognostic outputs may include generating the informational response and/or a portion thereof directly from the at least a datum; for instance, processing module 1708 may convert the one or more prognostic outputs into narrative language, images, and/or videos using any element of plan generation module 112 as described above, and may incorporate the narrative language, images, and/or videos into the informational response. Alternatively or additionally, generating the informational response using one or more prognostic outputs may include modifying the informational query using the one or more prognostic outputs and performing any step described herein for generating an informational response from an informational query using the modified informational query.

With continued reference to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 may be configured to retrieve at least an ameliorative output from an ameliorative process database 316 using an informational query and generate the informational response using the at least an ameliorative output. Alternatively or additionally, processing module 1708 may be configured to input an informational query to an ameliorative process label learner 244 operating on the at least a server, wherein the ameliorative process label learner 244 is designed and configured to generate at least a ameliorative output as a function of a training set correlating prognostic labels to ameliorative process labels and the informational query, receive, from the ameliorative process label learner 244, the at least an ameliorative output, and generate the informational response using the at least an ameliorative output. For instance, and without limitation, where a user input includes an inquiry about food, medication, supplements, fitness activities or the like as described above, processing module 1708 may retrieve information concerning such food, medication, supplements, fitness activities or the like as at least an ameliorative output; alternatively or additionally, any symptomatic descriptions may be associated with prognostic labels in informational query and/or a modified informational query, and used to generate recommended ameliorative processes, which may be any ameliorative processes described herein, using ameliorative process label database 316 and/or ameliorative process label learner 244. The above is described for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples as consistent with this disclosure. Informational response may further recommend an informed advisor, category of informed advisor, list of advisors, and/or ameliorative label based on the at least a user input.

Still referring to FIG. 18, generating the informational response using at least an ameliorative output may include generating the informational response and/or a portion thereof directly from the at least an ameliorative output; for instance, processing module 1708 may convert the at least an ameliorative output into narrative language, images, and/or videos using any element of plan generation module 112 as described above, and may incorporate the narrative language, images, and/or videos into the informational response. Alternatively or additionally, generating the informational response using at least an ameliorative output may include modifying the informational query using the at least an ameliorative output and performing any step described herein for generating an informational response from an informational query using the modified informational query.

With continued reference to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 may be configured to generate the at least an informational response by generating a plurality of informational responses using a first informational resource, retrieving at least an additional datum from at least a second informational resource, and selecting an informational response using the at least an additional datum. This may include, without limitation, elimination from the plurality of informational responses of one or more informational responses that are inconsistent with the at least an additional datum. For instance, and without limitation, where at least a user input symptom, diagnostic output, ameliorative process learner, and/or ameliorative process database may be used to generate a list of ameliorative processes that user may engage in to alleviate the symptom, and/or one or more categories of informed advisors who may be able to assist in alleviation, and/or a list of such informed advisors; second resource may include, for instance, user database, which may eliminate from any such list one or more elements that contradict one or more user preferences and/or constitutional restrictions. Continuing the example, and without limitation, nutritional recommendations that contradict user tastes, religious requirements, or the like as listed in user preference table 1504 may be eliminated, informed advisors that live too far away from the user according to user preferences listed in user preference table 1504 may be eliminated, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of the enormous variety of user preferences, constitutional restrictions, and other factors that may be used to eliminate one or more informational responses of a plurality of informational responses. Alternatively or additionally, selection of an informational response may be performed positively, for instance by matching the informational response to the at least a second datum. For instance, and without limitation, user table may list one or more user preferences, and processing module 1708 may select an informational response matching the one or more user preferences. Matching, whether performed negatively or positively, may be performed via any process described in this disclosure for matching one textual element to another, including string comparison, exact matching, detection of vector similarity, such as without limitation cosine similarity, above a threshold amount, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 18, second information resource may include user client module 124; in an embodiment, processing module 1708 may generate a user clarification question, provide the user clarification question to the user client module, and receive a user response from a user client device via the user client module. Generating the clarification question may be performed using any suitable process for generating a conversational response as described above and/or any process for generating a combined conversational and informational response as set forth in further detail below. For instance, and as a non-limiting illustration, default response database 1800 may contain a response template instructing artificial intelligence advisor, given variables stored in “option_1” and “option_2,” to concatenate string and variable values in the following form: “Did you mean”+option_1+“or”+option_2+“?” so as to receive a user clarification. Similar templates could be constructed asking a user if her or she prefers an option stored in a first variable to an option stored in a second variable, or the like. Generation of clarification question may include identifying a difference between a first informational response and a second informational response and forming a question for a user asking about the difference. For instance, if a first informational response provides a first prognostic label describing a disease state associated with a cough with no accompanying fever, and the second informational response provides a second prognostic label describing a disease state associated with a cough where a fever is present, a clarification question may ask whether the user has a fever; this approach for generating a request may be accomplished, without limitation, by dividing text describing each informational response, such as text obtained from a narrative language database, into tokens such as words or phrases, and using a similarity test such as vector similarity to detect one or more dissimilar tokens between two or more informational responses; the one or more dissimilar tokes may then be used to generate a conversational response as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 18, processing module 1708 may be configured to convert an informational response into at least a portion of a textual output; this may be performed using any process and/or processes as described above for converting diagnostic outputs to narrative language, images, videos, and/or combinations thereof in plan generator or the like. For instance, and without limitation, processing module 1708 may retrieve one or more strings and/or templates from narrative language database to generate a narrative language form of or analog to an informational output. A narrative language unit may perform conversion of informational output into at least a portion of a textual output.

Still referring to FIG. 18, in an embodiment, processing module 1708 may be configured to determine that the at least a query includes a conversation language query and an informational query, generate a conversational response using the conversational language query; generate an informational response using the informational query, and combine the conversational response and the informational response. Determination may be performed as described above. In an embodiment, processing module 1708 may generate each of conversational response and informational response as described above. Conversational response and informational response may be combined in any suitable manner. For instance, where conversational response and informational response are two separate sentences, clauses, or sequentially arrangeable phrases, combination may include concatenation; as a non-limiting illustration, conversational response may include an initial sentence such as “Hi. Thank you for your question.” and a final sentence such as “Do you have any more questions?” and informational response may include a statement such as “Your foot pain is consistent with diabetic neuropathy,” which processing module 1708 may combine into “Hi. Thank you for your question. Your foot pain is consistent with diabetic neuropathy. Do you have any more questions?” As a further non-limiting example, conversational response may include a template, as described above, into which an informational response may be inserted. As a non-limiting illustration, conversational response may be “Your foot pain is consistent with <INFO>.” and informational response, which processing module may use to replace “<INFO>” may be “diabetic neuropathy”; replacement may be performed as described above. Templates may be nested and/or concatenated; for instance a variable or label calling for insertion of a textual value into a template may itself refer to an additional template to be inserted at that point. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which conversational responses and informational responses may be combined to produce textual output.

As a non-limiting example and still referring to FIG. 18, at least a user input may include a user selection of at an ameliorative process as presented in comprehensive instruction set 116, for instance as presented in comprehensive instruction set 116; parsing module and/or processing module may generate an informational query as a result of the user input to compare the selected at least an ameliorative process to ameliorative process labels in diagnostic output. Continuing the example, comparison may include determining whether the selected at least an ameliorative process addresses a more urgent or higher-ranked prognostic label as described above; for instance, prognostic output may indicate that a user has a relatively urgent need to reduce alcohol consumption, lose weight, or the like, and a relatively less urgent need to improve flexibility, and user may have selected an ameliorative process corresponding to yoga lessons. Processing module may generate a response based on results of informational query, for instance to indicate to user that comprehensive instruction set 116 and/or diagnostic output indicate higher priorities, or additional priorities, not addressed by user selection; such indication may be performed, without limitation, by listing a highest-ranked priority, all prognostic labels ranked above those addressed by the user selection, a highest-ranked ameliorative process label, all ameliorative process labels ranked above the user selection, and/or all prognostic and/or ameliorative labels in diagnostic output. In an embodiment, system 100 may use this approach to generate suggestions reminding user to modify behaviors and/or address more urgent needs as determined by diagnostic engine. Alternatively or additionally, where user enters textual or other data indicating that user is about to engage in or has engaged in a particular activity, processing module may perform any informational query as described above, and generate a response that, as a non-limiting example, indicates to the user whether the activity is contrary to and/or consistent with comprehensive instruction set 116. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which such recommendations and/or reminders, generated according to any process and/or method as described herein, may be produced to aid a user in following comprehensive instruction set 116, improving user behavior, or otherwise beneficially improving choices having bearing on the user's constitution.

Referring again to FIG. 17, artificial intelligence advisor may include a consultation initiator 1712 configured to detect a consultation event in a user textual conversation and initiate a consultation with an informed advisor as a function of the consultation event. A consultation event, as used herein, is a situation where an informed advisor is needed to address a user's situation or concerns, such as when a user should be consulting with a doctor regarding an apparent medical emergency or new condition, or with an advisor who can lend emotional support when particularly distraught. Detection may be performed, without limitation, by matching an input and/or set of inputs to an output that constitutes an action of initiating a consultation; such a pairing of an input and/or input set may be learned using a machine learning process, for instance via general learner and/or user specific learner. In the latter case, information concerning a particular user's physical or emotional needs or condition may be a part of the training set used to generate the input/input set to consultation event pairing; for instance, a user with a history of heart disease may trigger consultation events upon any inputs describing shortness of breath, chest discomfort, arrhythmia, or the like. Initiation of consultation may include transmitting a message to an advisor client device 136 associated with an appropriate informed advisor, such as without limitation transmission of information regarding a potential medical emergency to a doctor able to assist in treating the emergency. Initiation of consultation may alternatively or additionally include providing an output to the user informing the user that a consultation with an informed advisor, who may be specified by name or role, is advisable. Consultation initiator 1712 may analyze consultation inputs, defined as any element of conversation input to, output from, and/or processed by artificial intelligence advisor 1608 and/or any component or module thereof, including without limitation user inputs, words or phrases extracted from user inputs conversational queries, informational queries, conversational outputs, informational outputs, and/or textual outputs. In an embodiment, consultation initiator may compare consultation inputs to keywords in a keyword listing 1716, where keywords may include any word or phrase as described in this disclosure, and comparison may include any form of comparison as described in this disclosure. Keyword listing 1716 may include any data structure and/or database suitable for storage, retrieval, and/or comparison of textual data. Keyword listing 1716 may be populated using expert submissions of keywords associated with consultation events; expert submissions may be collected and inserted to keyword listing 1716 using any methods, components, and/or modules as described above regarding expert knowledge database 304 and/or related elements. Keyword listing 1716 may include user-specific keywords; for instance, keyword listing may combine keywords with prognostic labels and/or user identifiers, such that a keyword encountered for a particular user, and/or for a user having a particular condition and/or prognosis, may generate a consultation event, while absent such matching data the keyword may not generate a consultation event.

Referring now to FIG. 21, consultation initiator 1712 may alternatively or additionally perform one or more machine-learning operations to detect consultation events. In an embodiment, consultation initiator may perform machine-learning operations using a consultation training set 2100, which may be any training set as described in this disclosure. Consultation training set may, as a non-limiting example, include a plurality of entries, each entry including an input having a word or phrase and an output indicating a category of consultation event; category of consultation event may include no consultation event, hospitalization, and/or consultation with a particular informed advisor such as a medical professional, medical specialist, nutritionist, or the like. Consultation training set 2100 may be assembled using, without limitation elements from corpus 2008 of conversations as described above, combined with data describing outcomes for users engaged in such conversations; outcomes may be entered by informed advisors who dealt with outcomes, such as without limitation medical professionals who treated a user after a given conversation. Additional users of system 100 may alternatively or additionally enter outcome information from records or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 21, consultation initiator 1712 may generate outputs indicating a consultation event, or absence of a consultation event, using at least a user entry and consultation training set. This may be performed according to any machine-learning process as described in this disclosure, such as without limitation any machine-learning process performed by prognostic label learner and/or language processing module 216. Consultation initiator 1712 may generate a consultation model 2104 relating conversation text to consultation events. For instance, and without limitation, consultation initiator 1712 may be configured to perform one or more supervised learning processes, as described above; supervised learning processes may be performed by a supervised learning module 2108, which may be any supervised learning nodule as described in this disclosure. Inputs to supervised learning module 2108 may include, without limitation words or phrases from corpus 2008, while outputs may include categories of consultation events. Consultation initiator 1712 may perform one or more unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; unsupervised processes may be performed by an unsupervised learning module 2112, which may be any unsupervised learning nodule as described in this disclosure. Unsupervised learning module 2112 may, for instance, detect correlations between keywords from keyword listing 1716 and/or words or phrases from corpus 2008 that supervised learning module 2108 has associated with consultation events, and other words and phrases, to add additional keywords and/or potential words/phrases that may trigger consultation.

Continuing to view FIG. 21, consultation initiator 1712 may be configured to perform a lazy learning process as a function of the consultation training set 2100 at least a user input. Lazy learning processes may be performed by a lazy learning module 2116 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module.

In an embodiment, and still viewing FIG. 21, machine-learning processes and/or modules of consultation initiator 1712 may be combined with keyword detection. For instance, machine-learning processes and/or outputs may be triggered upon keyword detection or may operate in parallel or independently from keyword-detection processes. Machine-learning may supplement keyword detection; for instance, and without limitation there may be some keywords that definitely cause consultation events, or there may be keywords that are not enough by themselves to trigger consultation, but may trigger consultation if combined with another detection, which may include a machine-learning output and/or detection of an additional keyword. Machine-learning processes may add keywords when a certain keyword is repeatedly found to be linked to a consultation event, such as without limitation if a linear regression analysis or the like maps a single word or phrase, and/or a combination of one phrase with one prognostic label or one category of prognostic label and/or user datum; such detected keywords may be added to keyword listing 1716 by consultation initiator 1712. As a non-limiting illustration, machine-learning algorithms may determine that if user is over fifty, has elevated blood pressure, and complains of abnormal taste and/or smells, this may indicate stroke, and may create a keyword entry based on that. Consultation initiator 1712 may automatically place an emergency call for one or more consultation events; for instance and without limitation, keyword listing 1716 and/or consultation model 2104 may include flags indicating that a detected consultation event requires an emergency call. User database 1036 or any other suitable database may list one or more numbers to place emergency calls to, for instance using voice-over-internet-protocol (VoIP) or other automatic telephonic call protocols.

Referring now to FIG. 22, an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence method 2200 of vibrant constitutional guidance is illustrated. At step 2205, a diagnostic engine 108 operating on at least a computing device 104 records at least a biological extraction from a user; in an embodiment, and without limitation, this may be implemented as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21. At step 2210, diagnostic engine 108 generates a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction, the diagnostic output including at least a prognostic label and at least an ameliorative process label; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21. At step 2215, an advisory module 132 operating on the at least a computing device 104 receives at least a user input from a user client device; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21

At step 2220, and still referring to FIG. 22, an artificial intelligence advisor 1608 operating on the at least a server generates at least a textual output using the diagnostic output and the at least a user input; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21. For instance, and without limitation, generating the at least a textual output may include generating at least a query using the at least a user input, and generating the at least a textual output as a function of the at least a query; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21. Artificial intelligence advisor 1608 and/or a processing module 1708 may determine that the at least a query includes a conversational language query and generating a conversational response using the conversational language query; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21. As a further non-limiting example, artificial intelligence advisor 1608 and/or a processing module 1708 may determine that the at least a query includes an informational query and generate an informational response using the informational query; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21.

Still referring to FIG. 22, artificial intelligence advisor 1608 and/or processing module 1708 may submit an informational query to one or more informational resources; for instance, and without limitation, artificial intelligence advisor 1608 and/or a processing module 1708 may input the informational query to a prognostic label learner 236 operating on at least a computing device 104, where the prognostic label learner 236 is designed and configured to generate at least a prognostic output as a function of a training set 200 correlating physiological state data to prognostic labels and the informational query, receive, the at least a prognostic output from the prognostic label learner 236, and generate the informational response using the at least a prognostic output; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21. As a further non-limiting example, artificial intelligence advisor 1608 and/or a processing module 1708 may input an informational query to an ameliorative process label learner 244 operating on at least a computing device 104, where the ameliorative process label learner 244 is designed and configured to generate at least a ameliorative output as a function of a training set 220 correlating prognostic labels to ameliorative process labels and the informational query, receive the at least an ameliorative output from the ameliorative process label learner 244, and generate the informational response using the at least an ameliorative output; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21.

At step 2225, and continuing to refer to FIG. 22, advisory module 132 transmits at least a textual output to the user client device; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-21.

Referring now to FIG. 23, an exemplary embodiment 2300 of an artificial intelligence advisory method of vibrant constitutional guidance is illustrated. At step 2305, computing device 104 receives a user input from a user client device. A user input includes any of the user inputs as described above in more detail in reference to FIGS. 1-22. For instance and without limitation, a user input may contain a question about a disease state that a user was recently diagnosed with. In yet another non-limiting example, a user input may contain a question if a user can eat a chocolate chip cookie while following a certain diet or way of eating. Computing device 104 receives a user input containing a user identifier. A user identifier includes any of the user identifiers as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. Computing deice 104 compares a user identifier received within at least a user input to a user identifier stored within computing device 104. For example, computing device 104 may evaluate a user identifier received from a user client device to make sure it matches and is identical to a user identifier stored within computing device 104. Computing device 104 authenticates a user identifier such as by confirming the true identify of a user. Computing device 104 may not authenticate a user identifier when the user identifier received with a user input does not match a user identifier for the user stored on computing device 104.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, at step 2310 computing device 104 evaluates the content of a user input to identify a theme of conversation. A theme of conversation includes any topic and/or subject identified within a user input. Computing device 104 identifies a theme of conversation such as by generating a classifier, as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. Computing device 104 identifies a theme of conversation utilizing a user behavior learner, that identifies a theme of conversation using previous user behaviors. A user behavior learner includes any of the user behavior learners as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. For instance and without limitation, user behavior learner may learn types of questions and themes of conversations that a user has historically asked questions about. In such an instance, user behavior learner may identify common themes and user inputs that may be utilized to help identify future themes of conversation. Computing device 104 may identify a theme of conversation utilizing a questionnaire completed by a user. A questionnaire includes any of the questionnaires as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. In an embodiment, a questionnaire may identify one or more themes of conversation that a user may be seeking information about.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, computing device 104 evaluates the content of a user input to identify an alert condition. An alert condition includes any of the alert conditions as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. In an embodiment, an alert condition may be identified using input contained within expert knowledge database. For instance and without limitation, a user input may contain symptoms the user is experiencing that include feeling down, feeling anxious, and feeling hopeless about life in general. In such an instance, computing device 104 may identify an alert condition and transmit the user input containing the list of symptoms to an advisory client device. Computing device 104 transmits the content of a user input to an advisory client device. Computing device 104 transmits the content of the user input to an advisory client device utilizing any network methodology as described herein.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, at step 2315, computing device 104 locates an informed advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing an identified theme of conversation. In an embodiment, computing device 104 may located an informed advisor who may be skilled in and/or have a practice centered around an identified theme of conversation. For instance and without limitation, a user input relating to a toothache that the user is experiencing may relate to a theme of conversation such as dentistry and oral medicine, and as such computing device 104 locates advisor client devices operated by dentists and those specializing in oral medicine such as orthodontists and oral surgeons. Computing device 104 locates a first advisor client device operated by a first informed advisor and determines that the first advisor client device is not active. A first advisor client device is not active such as in the situations as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. Computing device 104 locates a second advisor client device operated by a second informed advisor and determines the second advisor client device is active. This may be performed utilizing any of the methodologies as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. For instance and without limitation, computing device 104 may locate a first advisor client device operated by an internal medicine physician, who may be busy and speaking with another client, and as such computing device 104 may determine the first advisor client device is not active. Computing device 104 may locate a second advisor client device operated by a nurse practitioner who the computing device 104 may determine is active. In an embodiment, computing device 104 may transmit a message utilizing any network methodology as described herein, to determine if an advisor client device is active or not active.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, at step 2320, computing device 104 matches the theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process. Matching may include selecting a repository response that is related to the theme of conversation. A first machine-learning process includes any of the machine-learning processes as described herein. In an embodiment, a first machine-learning process may include generating a behavior classifier. A behavior classifier includes any of the behavior classifiers as described herein. A behavior classifier utilizes a theme of conversation as an input, and outputs a repository response using a classification algorithm. A classification algorithm includes any of the classification algorithms as described above in more detail in reference to FIGS. 1-22. In an embodiment, a first machine-learning process may include generating a clustering algorithm. A clustering algorithm includes any of the clustering algorithms as described above in more detail in reference to FIGS. 1-22.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, at step 2325, computing device 104 selects a textual output contained within a repository response. Computing device 104 may select a textual output from within a plurality of textual outputs by generating a query using a user input. For example, computing device 104 may generate a query that contains one or more key words and/or phrases contained within a user input. A query includes any of the queries as described above in more detail in reference to FIGS. 1-22. Computing device 104 locates a repository response utilizing a query and selects a textual output from a plurality of textual outputs utilizing the query. For instance and without limitation, computing device 104 may receive a user input containing a question if a user can eat buckwheat groats while on a wheat free diet. Computing device 104 locates a theme of conversation as nutrition, and locates a repository response intended for wheat free diets. Computing device 104 generates a query containing “buckwheat groats and wheat free” and locates a textual output contained within the selected repository response that contains an answer to the search query. Computing device 104 selects a textual output contained within a repository response utilizing feedback and/or input from expert knowledge database.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, computing device 104 generates a textual output wherein the textual output contains a conference initiator. A conference initiator includes any of the conference initiators as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 17. Computing device 104 transmits a conference initiator to a user client device and an advisor client device. This may be performed utilizing any network methodology as described herein. Computing device 104 facilitates a conversation between a user client device and an advisor client device utilizing a conference initiator.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, at step 2320, computing device 104 transmits a textual output to a user client device. This may be performed utilizing any network methodology as described herein.

Systems and methods described herein may provide improvements to communication with users regarding user questions and diagnostic results. By using a rule-based model or a machine-learned model to generate feature values of data contained within the collected data, one or more analyses are performed on the feature values, and outputs of training data are generated and included in an optimized set of data. Optimized data, which may be used in conjunction with further machine-learning and/or language-processing protocols, may provide users with not only a method of acquiring detailed genetic and physiological information, but more importantly the ability to make decisions that support vibrant health and longevity influenced by the plurality of information based on the collected data. Furthermore, the systems and methods provide an unconventional use of the collected data and textual inputs via automatic execution of processes and services by the vibrant constitutional advice network based on the generated diagnostic and language processing information. Thus, the systems and methods described herein improve the functioning of computing systems by optimizing big data processing and improving the utility of the processed big data via its unconventional application, as well as harnessing that improved processing and utility to generate intelligence conversational responses and guidance, but most importantly the system and methods improve overall health and lifestyle via the centralized platform promoting vibrant life and longevity.

It is to be noted that any one or more of the aspects and embodiments described herein may be conveniently implemented using one or more machines (e.g., one or more computing devices that are utilized as a user computing device for an electronic document, one or more server devices, such as a document server, etc.) programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the software art. Aspects and implementations discussed above employing software and/or software modules may also include appropriate hardware for assisting in the implementation of the machine executable instructions of the software and/or software module.

Such software may be a computer program product that employs a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable storage medium may be any medium that is capable of storing and/or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein. Examples of a machine-readable storage medium include, but are not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disc (e.g., CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, etc.), a magneto-optical disk, a read-only memory “ROM” device, a random access memory “RAM” device, a magnetic card, an optical card, a solid-state memory device, an EPROM, an EEPROM, and any combinations thereof. A machine-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact discs or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory. As used herein, a machine-readable storage medium does not include transitory forms of signal transmission.

Such software may also include information (e.g., data) carried as a data signal on a data carrier, such as a carrier wave. For example, machine-executable information may be included as a data-carrying signal embodied in a data carrier in which the signal encodes a sequence of instruction, or portion thereof, for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and any related information (e.g., data structures and data) that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein.

Examples of a computing device include, but are not limited to, an electronic book reading device, a computer workstation, a terminal computer, a server computer, a handheld device (e.g., a tablet computer, a smartphone, etc.), a web appliance, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify an action to be taken by that machine, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a computing device may include and/or be included in a kiosk.

FIG. 24 shows a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a computing device in the exemplary form of a computer system 2400 within which a set of instructions for causing a control system to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be executed. It is also contemplated that multiple computing devices may be utilized to implement a specially configured set of instructions for causing one or more of the devices to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. Computer system 2400 includes a processor 2404 and a memory 2408 that communicate with each other, and with other components, via a bus 2412. Bus 2412 may include any of several types of bus structures including, but not limited to, a memory bus, a memory controller, a peripheral bus, a local bus, and any combinations thereof, using any of a variety of bus architectures.

Memory 2408 may include various components (e.g., machine-readable media) including, but not limited to, a random-access memory component, a read only component, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a basic input/output system 2416 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer system 2400, such as during start-up, may be stored in memory 2408. Memory 2408 may also include (e.g., stored on one or more machine-readable media) instructions (e.g., software) 2420 embodying any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. In another example, memory 2408 may further include any number of program modules including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, and any combinations thereof.

Computer system 2400 may also include a storage device 2424. Examples of a storage device (e.g., storage device 2424) include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disc drive in combination with an optical medium, a solid-state memory device, and any combinations thereof. Storage device 2424 may be connected to bus 2412 by an appropriate interface (not shown). Example interfaces include, but are not limited to, SCSI, advanced technology attachment (ATA), serial ATA, universal serial bus (USB), IEEE 1394 (FIREWIRE), and any combinations thereof. In one example, storage device 2424 (or one or more components thereof) may be removably interfaced with computer system 2400 (e.g., via an external port connector (not shown)). Particularly, storage device 2424 and an associated machine-readable medium 2428 may provide nonvolatile and/or volatile storage of machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer system 2400. In one example, software 2420 may reside, completely or partially, within machine-readable medium 2428. In another example, software 2420 may reside, completely or partially, within processor 2404.

Computer system 2400 may also include an input device 2432. In one example, a user of computer system 2400 may enter commands and/or other information into computer system 2400 via input device 2432. Examples of an input device 2432 include, but are not limited to, an alpha-numeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a pointing device, a joystick, a gamepad, an audio input device (e.g., a microphone, a voice response system, etc.), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a touchpad, an optical scanner, a video capture device (e.g., a still camera, a video camera), a touchscreen, and any combinations thereof. Input device 2432 may be interfaced to bus 2412 via any of a variety of interfaces (not shown) including, but not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a USB interface, a FIREWIRE interface, a direct interface to bus 2412, and any combinations thereof. Input device 2432 may include a touch screen interface that may be a part of or separate from display 2436, discussed further below. Input device 2432 may be utilized as a user selection device for selecting one or more graphical representations in a graphical interface as described above.

A user may also input commands and/or other information to computer system 2400 via storage device 2424 (e.g., a removable disk drive, a flash drive, etc.) and/or network interface device 2440. A network interface device, such as network interface device 2440, may be utilized for connecting computer system 2400 to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 2444, and one or more remote devices 2448 connected thereto. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network, such as network 2444, may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software 2420, etc.) may be communicated to and/or from computer system 2400 via network interface device 2440.

Computer system 2400 may further include a video display adapter 2452 for communicating a displayable image to a display device, such as display device 2436. Examples of a display device include, but are not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, a light emitting diode (LED) display, and any combinations thereof. Display adapter 2452 and display device 2436 may be utilized in combination with processor 2404 to provide graphical representations of aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to a display device, computer system 2400 may include one or more other peripheral output devices including, but not limited to, an audio speaker, a printer, and any combinations thereof. Such peripheral output devices may be connected to bus 2412 via a peripheral interface 2456. Examples of a peripheral interface include, but are not limited to, a serial port, a USB connection, a FIREWIRE connection, a parallel connection, and any combinations thereof.

The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Additionally, although particular methods herein may be illustrated and/or described as being performed in a specific order, the ordering is highly variable within ordinary skill to achieve methods, and systems according to the present disclosure. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.

Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An artificial intelligence advisory system for vibrant constitutional guidance, the system comprising: a computing device; an advisory module operating on the computing device, wherein the advisory module is configured to: receive at least a user input from a user client device; evaluate the content of the at least a user input to identify a theme of conversation; and locate an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing the identified theme of conversation; and an artificial intelligence advisor operating on the computing device, wherein the artificial intelligence advisor is configured to: match the theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process, wherein the repository response contains a plurality of textual outputs related to the theme of conversation; select a textual output contained within the repository response; and transmit the textual output to the user client device.
 2. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the advisory module is further configured to: receive the at least a user input containing a user identifier; compare the user identifier to a user identifier stored within the computing device; and authenticate the user identifier.
 3. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the advisory module further comprises a user behavior learner configured to identify the theme of conversation using previous user behaviors.
 4. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the advisory module is further configured to identify the theme of conversation utilizing a questionnaire completed by the user.
 5. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the advisory module is further configured to: evaluate the content of the user input and identify an alert condition; and transmit the content of the user input to the advisory client device.
 6. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the advisory module is further configured to: locate a first advisor client device operated by a first informed advisor; determine the first advisor client device is not active; locate a second advisor client device operated by a second informed advisor; and determine the second advisor client device is active.
 7. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the advisory module further includes: a parsing module configured to generate a query using the at least a user input; and a processing module configured to locate the repository response utilizing the query; and select the textual output from the plurality of textual outputs as a function of the query.
 8. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the first machine-learning process further comprises generating a behavior classifier, wherein the behavior classifier utilizes the theme of conversation as an input, and outputs the repository response using a classification algorithm.
 9. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the first machine-learning process further comprises generating a clustering algorithm.
 10. The artificial intelligence advisory system of claim 1, wherein the artificial intelligence advisor is further configured to: generate a textual output wherein the textual output contains a conference initiator; transmit the conference initiator to the user client device and the advisor client device; and facilitate a conversation between the user client device and the advisor client device utilizing the conference initiator.
 11. An artificial intelligence advisory method of vibrant constitutional guidance, the method comprising: receiving by a computing device, at least a user input from a user client device; evaluating by the computing device, the content of the at least a user input to identify a theme of conversation; locating by the computing device, an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor utilizing the identified theme of conversation; matching by the computing device, the theme of conversation to a repository response utilizing a first machine-learning process, wherein the repository response contains a plurality of textual outputs related to the theme of conversation; selecting by the computing device, a textual output contained within the repository response; and transmitting by the computing device, the textual output to the user client device.
 12. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein receiving the at least a user input further comprises: receiving the at least a user input containing a user identifier; comparing the user identifier to a user identifier stored within the computing device; and authenticating the user identifier.
 13. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein identifying the theme of conversation further comprises generating a user behavior learner configured to identify the theme of conversation using previous user behaviors.
 14. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein identifying the theme of conversation further comprises utilizing a questionnaire completed by the user.
 15. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein evaluating the content of the user input further comprises: evaluating the content of the user input and identify an alert condition; and transmitting the content of the user input to the advisory client device.
 16. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein locating the advisor client device further comprises: locating a first advisor client device operated by a first informed advisor; determining the first advisor client device is not active; locating a second advisor client device operated by a second informed advisor; and determining the second advisor client device is active.
 17. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein matching the theme of conversation further comprises: generating a query using the at least a user input; locating the repository response utilizing the query; and selecting the textual output from the plurality of textual outputs as a function of the query.
 18. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein the first machine-learning process further comprises generating a behavior classifier, wherein the behavior classifier utilizes the theme of conversation as an input, and outputs the repository response using a classification algorithm.
 19. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11, wherein the first machine-learning process further comprises generating a clustering algorithm.
 20. The artificial intelligence advisory method of claim 11 further comprising: generating a textual output wherein the textual output contains a conference initiator; transmitting the conference initiator to the user client device and the advisor client device; and facilitating a conversation between the user client device and the advisor client device utilizing the conference initiator. 